What is more interesting, Leonardo's food habits or his ancestry?
Prints hold clues to da Vinci
By studying papers Leonardo da Vinci touched, anthropologists have pieced
together the artist's left index fingerprint – a finding that could shed light
on his mother's heritage.
ROME – Anthropologists said they have pieced together Leonardo da Vinci's
left index fingerprint – a discovery that could help provide information on
such matters as the food the artist ate and whether his mother was of Arabic
origin.
The reconstruction of the fingerprint was the result of three years of research
and could help attribute disputed paintings or manuscripts, said Luigi Capasso,
an anthropologist and director of the Anthropology Research Institute at Chieti
University in central Italy.
“It adds the first touch of humanity. We knew how Leonardo saw the world and
the future – but who was he?” Capasso said recently. “This biological
information is about his being human, not being a genius.” The research was
based on a first core of photographs of about 200 fingerprints – most of them
partial– taken from about 52 papers handled by Leonardo in his life. Capasso's
work, presented in 2005 in the journal Anthropologie, published in the
Czech Republic, is on display in an exhibition in the town of Chieti through
March 30.
The artist often ate while working, and Capasso and other experts said his
fingerprints could include traces of saliva, blood or the food he ate the night
before. It is information that could help clear up questions about his origins.
Certain distinctive features are more common in the fingerprints of some
ethnic populations, experts say.
“The one we found in this fingertip applies to 60 percent of the Arabic
population, which suggests the possibility that his mother was of Middle-Eastern
origin,” Capasso said.
The idea that Leonardo's mother could have been a slave who came to Tuscany
from Constantinople is not new and has been the object of other research.
Alessandro Vezzosi, a Leonardo expert and the director of a museum dedicated
to the artist in his hometown of Vinci, said there are documents that appear to
back this up.
“This coincides with documented indications that she was Oriental, at least
from the Mediterranean area, not a peasant of Vinci,” he said.
Vezzosi, who manages the archive of documents Capasso used for his study,
warned that her origin cannot be determined with any certainty until a contract
documenting her sale is found.
“Still, her name was Caterina, the most common name among slaves in Tuscany,
and we have no certain elements about her,” he said.
Dirty paws
The experts say some of the fingerprints left on the manuscripts might
belong to the people who handled them over time. However, those caused by
attempts to remove ink blots were surely left by the author, Capasso said.
Biological information on Leonardo is largely incomplete. The artist, who was
generally but not exclusively left-handed, used his fingers to paint, and his
thumbprint recurs on the manuscripts, Vezzosi said.
Leonardo sometimes worked while eating or traveling, and his fingers were
often dirty, sometimes with residue of food, Vezzosi said.
Carlo Vecce, a professor of Italian literature at Naples' University and a
leading Leonardo expert, said the research, in which he was not involved,
appears to be “founded.”
“The research on Leonardo's fingerprints is very interesting. It's always
good to locate and distinguish these details both on the paintings and on the
drawings,” he said. “The fingerprints can tell us if Leonardo was there or if he
intervened (on a painting), it's a hint.”
Vecce noted, though, that a fingerprint is not enough proof to attribute a
work with certainty, and such a discovery does not necessarily add much to what
is known about the artist.
“It gives us the illusion of a contact with the genius,” he said. “But the
most important things about Leonardo are those that concern his intellectual
activity, those that we get by reading his words or interpreting what he wrote.”