The truth about 'Truth Serum'
It's hard to determine what's true about 'truth serum'
By David Brown
If there is a “truth serum” that works, it is a secret that nobody is giving up.
The debate this year on interrogation techniques in the war on terrorism raised
anew a question that goes back at least 2,000 years. Is there something you can give
a person that will make him tell the truth?
The ancient Romans had an answer: Yes.
“In vino veritas” – “in wine there is truth” – is sometimes attributed to the
natural philosopher Pliny the Elder. The observation made in the first century
has been borne out over the millennia by many a remorseful inebriate. And, in
truth, alcohol given as intravenous ethanol was an early form of truth serum.
In the 21st century, however, the answer appears to be: No. There is no
pharmaceutical compound today whose proven effect is the consistent or predictable
enhancement of truth-telling.
The modern fascination with truth-eliciting drugs began in 1916 when an
obstetrician named Robert House, practicing in a town outside Dallas named
Ferris, saw a strange event during a home delivery.
The woman in labor was in a state of “twilight sleep” induced by scopolamine,
a compound derived from the henbane plant that blocks the action of the
neurotransmitter acetylcholine. House had asked her husband for a scale to
weigh the newborn. The man looked for it and returned to the bedroom saying
he could not find it, whereupon his wife, still under the anesthetic, told him
exactly where it was.
House became convinced that scopolamine could make anyone answer a question
truthfully, and he went on to promote its forensic use.
Police departments used it – and in a few cases judges permitted it
– throughout the 1920s and 1930s. Other drugs were also tried, most famously
the barbiturates Pentothal and Amytal. But by the 1950s, most scientists had
declared the very notion of truth serums invalid, and most courts had ruled
testimony gained through their use inadmissible.
The emerging consensus did not stop the most notorious search for truth
serum, the CIA's Project MK-ULTRA. Starting in 1953, the agency tested the
behavioral effects of several drugs, including their effects on interrogation.
Many people were given substances without their knowledge or consent. Frank
Olson jumped from a hotel window to his death after taking the hallucinogen LSD.
The program ended in the late 1960s. Its abuses – many revealed in
congressional hearings in 1977 – produced bad publicity for the spy agency.
Whether a search for truth serums has occurred in recent decades,
and especially since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, is a matter
of differing opinion.
Gordon Barland was a captain in the U.S. Army Combat Development Command's
intelligence agency in the 1960s. Before leaving active duty in 1967 he was
asked to write up “materiel objectives.” He put on the wish list a drug that
would aid interrogation.
He later became a research psychologist and spent 14 years working at the
Department of Defense Polygraph Institute. While psychopharmacology was not
his specialty, trying to catch liars was.
“I would have expected that if there was some sort of truth drug in general
use, I would have heard rumors of it. I never did,” said Barland, who retired
in 2000 and now lives in Utah. He further doubts that the government would
again engage in such experiments, given the MK-ULTRA experience.
“It would be very difficult to get a project like that off the ground,” he speculated.
Whether such a substance could ever be used legally is a question some
legal scholars believe is still open.
“In the United States, no law at either the state or national level
makes the use of truth serum a crime per se,” Jason Odeshoo wrote in the
Stanford Law Review in 2004.
This ambiguous legal status, combined with advances in neuroscience,
lead some to suspect there may be a second act for truth serum.