|
|
A review of Cannabis
diseases
J. M. McPartland
AMRITA, 53 Washington Street, Middlebury, VT,
05753, USA
McPartland, J. M., 1996. A review of
Cannabis diseases. Journal of the International Hemp Association
3(1): 19-23. Diseases of Cannabis are caused by
organisms or abiotic sources. Organisms include fungi (first and
foremost), nematodes, parasitic plants, bacteria, and viruses. Abiotic
(non-living) causes include nutrient deficiencies, pollutants and genetic
diseases. Different diseases prevail in different crops (e.g., drug
cultivars versus fiber cultivars). Disease prevalence is also modulated by
geography and climate. The claim that Cannabis has no diseases is
not correct, Cannabis suffers over 100 diseases, but less than a dozen
are serious. Serious diseases include gray mold, hemp canker, damping
off, assorted leaf spots, blights, stem cankers, root rots, nematode diseases,
broomrape, macro- and micronutrient deficiencies, and genetic diseases.
Environmentally stressed plants become predisposed to diseases. Stress
incudes drought, insufficient light, untoward temperatures, or growing plants in
monoculture.
Introduction Despite
the oft-repeated quote, "hemp has no enemies" (Dewey 1914), Cannabis
suffers many diseases. Agrios (1988) estimates 11% of fiber crops are
lost to diseases. This statistic does not include insect injury.
Disease, by definition, is continued irritation damage by a causal factor (be it
an organism or the environment). In contrast, injury is due to a transient
causal factor. Insects are transient, they cause feeding injury, not
disease. Insects will be the subject of our next review.

Figure 1. Shapes and sizes of some organisms associated
with Cannabis (adapted from Agrios, 1988)
Cucumber Mosaic virus Aphid stylet Fungus mycelium
Mycoplasma-like organisms Tobacco Mosaic virus Head of
Nematode Nucleolus Bacteria Nucleus
Organisms that cause continued irritation
(disease) include viruses, bacteria, fungi, parasitic plants, and nematodes
(Figure 1). Plant diseases are almost always caused by fungi and rarely
caused by bacteria. In people this fungi-to-bacteria ratio is
reversed. Few Cannabis diseases can be transmitted to humans, but
there are exceptions (McPartland, 1994). Some diseases
prevail in Cannabis fiber and oil seed crops, other diseases predominate
in drug crops. Disease prevalence varies geographically. For
instance, many virus diseases are limited by the range of their insect vectors.
Disease prevalence shifts between greenhouse crops and outdoor
crops. Disease prevalence alters as plants grow from seedlings to
flowering adults. (Table 1).
Table 1. Common Cannabis
diseases
| Seedling diseases |
Flower & leaf
diseases, outdoors |
Flower & leaf,
diseases, indoors |
Stem &
branch diseases |
Root diseases |
Damping-off fungi Storage
fungi Genetic sterility |
Gray mold Yellow and Brown leaf
spots Downy mildew Olive leaf spot Nutritional diseases Brown
blight Bacterial leaf diseases |
Nutritional diseases Pink
rot Gray mold Powdery mildew Brown blight Virus
diseases |
Gray mold Hemp
canker Fusarium canker Fusarium wilt Stem nema Charcoal
rot Anthracnose Striatura ulcerosa Dodder |
Fusarium root rot Root knot
nema Broomrape Rhizoc root rot Sclerotium rot Cyst
nema |
Three lists of Cannabis diseases have
been collated recently. McPartland (1991) lists diseases by their common
names (American Phytopathological Society URL address : http://www.scisoc.org).
This list is unweighted—severe and epidemic diseases are presented next
to rare and benign diseases without differentiation. Termorshuizen (1991)
lists diseases by their causal organisms, alphabetically. His discussion
is weighted by disease severity and organized geographically. But he is
not entirely critical of old taxonomy. Gutberlet & Karus (1995) list
diseases by their causal organisms, taxonomically. Their list is not
weighted by disease severity nor critical of taxonomy. The taxonomy of
Cannabis pathogens has been ignored since the 1930s. Concerning
fungi alone, the scientific literature cites 400+ taxa as Cannabis
pathogens. Research reveals many of these species are
misidentifications or taxonomic synonyms (McPartland 1995 a-e). After a
name-by-name review, McPartland (1992) determined the 400+ taxa represent about
88 true species of Cannabis fungal pathogens. This
review is presented taxonomically, weighted by severity. Discussion is
organized primarily for fiber crops and geographically centered in Europe.
The review does not discuss control measures.
Fungi As mentioned
above, at least 88 species of fungi attack Cannabis and more are being
discovered every year (McPartland & Hughes 1994, McPartland & Cubeta
1996). By far the most significant is gray mold, caused by Botrytis
cinerea (teleomorph Botryotinia fuckeliana). B. cinerea
thrives in temperate regions with high humidity and cool to moderate
temperatures. Under these conditions gray mold can reach epidemic
proportions and completely destroy a Cannabis crop within a week (Barloy
& Pelhate 1962). B. cinerea attacks many crop plants and weed species
worldwide. Gray mold presents in three scenarios,
depending on plant maturity and cultivar. Seedlings succumb to damping
off, discussed below. In fiber cultivars gray mold presents as a stem
disease. It arises as a gray-brown mat of mycelium which becomes covered
by masses of conidia (fungal spores). Stems become chlorotic at margins of
the mat. Enzymes released by B. cinerea reduce stems to soft
shredded cankers. Stems often snap at canker sites. Gray mold may
encircle and girdle stems, wilting everything above the canker. Fiber
varieties become more susceptible after canopy closure. In field
experiments in the Netherlands the disease was found from the beginning of July
(Van der Werf and Van Geel, 1994). Van der Werf et al. (1995) note
Hungarian Kompolti Hibrid TC is more susceptible to gray mold than other fiber
varieties. Dempsey (1975) says the Russian cultivars JUS-1 and JUS-7 are
resistant, but these may no longer be available (de Meijer
1995). In drug cultivars, gray mold infests flowering
tops. Large moisture-retaining female buds are most susceptible. Fan
leaflets first turn yellow and wilt, then pistils begin to brown. Whole
inflorescences soon become enveloped in a fuzzy gray mycelium then degrade into
a gray-brown slime. Drug varieties are most susceptible during flowering
near harvest time. Dense tightly-packed buds of Cannabis afghanica
Clarke tend to hold moisture and easily rot (Clarke 1987). Afghan
cultivars evolved in very arid conditions and have no resistance to gray
mold. This unfavorable trait is often expressed in hybrids that have only
a small percentage of C. afghanica Clarke heritage.
For the second most important disease, Termorshuizen (1991) lists hemp
canker. This diease is caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum.
The fungus primarily attacks fiber cultivars in Europe, but it has caused up to
40% losses in North America (Hockey 1927) and damaged hemp in Australia (Synnott
1941) and Tasmania (Lisson & Mendham 1995). Hemp canker has also
appeared on drug cultivars in India (Bilgrami et al. 1981).
Symptoms begin as watersoaked lesions on stems and branches of plants nearing
maturity. The lesions collapse into cankers and become darkly
discolored. Affected areas take on a shredded appearance and the pith
becomes filled with a white cottony mycelium. Plants remain in this
condition or wilt and fall over. By September large black sclerotia
develop on the stem surface or within pith of dead stalks.
Damping off fungi kill seeds in soil or seedlings shortly after they emerge from
the soil. Fungi invade stems of seedlings at the soil line, causing a
brown watery soft rot, then the plants topple over. Most damping off is
caused by two Protoctistan Pythium species (technically they are
o–mycetes, not fungi), P. aphanidermatum and P. ultimum.
Several fungi also cause damping off—Rhizoctonia solani, Botrytis
cinerea, Macrophomina phaseolina, and several Fusarium
species, F. solani, F. oxysporum, F. sulphurem, F.
avenaceum, F. graminearum. Together they make damping off a
ubiquitous problem, attacking all cultivars of Cannabis (Bush Doctor
1985). The two most common leaf spot diseases are yellow
leaf spot caused by two Septoria species (McPartland 1995d), and brown
leaf spot caused by about eight Phoma and Ascochyta species
(McPartland 1995c). These diseases rarely kill plants but sharply reduce
crop yields. Two common diseases of fiber varieties are downy mildew,
caused by two Pseudoperonospora species, and olive leaf spot caused by a
Pseudocercospora species and a Cercospora species. Pink rot,
caused by Trichothecium roseum, has recently killed greenhouse-grown drug
cultivars and seems to be on the rise. Less frequently seen but equally
virulent diseases include brown blight (caused by two Alternaria and two
Stemphylium species), anthracnose (caused by two Colletotrichum
species) and white leaf spot (caused by Phomopsis ganjae).
Powdery mildews, black mildews, and rusts are caused by high-visibility fungi,
but rarely cause serious problems (McPartland 1983). Some
leaf disease fungi also infest stems, especially Trichothecium roseum,
Phoma, Stemphylium, Colletotrichum, and Phomopsis
species. The most serious causes of stem cankers are Fusarium
species—F. graminearum and F. avenaceum occur in cooler
climates, F. sulphureum and F. sambucinum in warmer
climates. Some root rots cause serious losses.
Barloy & Pelhate (1962) considered root rot caused by Fusarium solani
the worst disease of hemp in France. Pandotra & Sastry (1967)
report a virulent strain of Rhizoctonia solani destroying 80% of drug
plants in northern India. Root rot by Sclerotium rolfsii
predominates in southern temperate zones and the tropics, on both fiber and
drug cultivars (Ferri 1961). Above-ground symptoms of root
rots are hard to distinguish from wilt diseases. Three wilt diseases are
important—fusarium wilt caused by two forms of Fusarium oxysporum,
verticillium wilt caused by two Verticillium species, and premature wilt
(also called charcoal rot) caused by Macrophomina phaseolina.
Fusarium wilt received attention as a potential biocontrol to eliminate illegal
marijuana plantations (Hildebrand & McCain 1978, Noviello et al.
1990). Wilt diseases are more severe in Cannabis fields harboring
root-wounding nematodes or broomrape.
Nematodes Nematodes
are tiny roundworms, also called eelworms. Nematodes are not closely
related to earthworms. Built on a much smaller and simpler scale, they
have no respiratory nor circulatory systems. Their nervous system is so
simple it can be described at the level of individual cells.
Caenorhabditis elegans, for instance, has exactly 302
neurons. Crop damage by nematodes is underrated due to
their small size and the unseen (mostly underground) nature of their
pathology. Above-ground symptoms consist of stunting, reduced yield and
insipient wilting (drooping of leaves during midday with recovery at
night). Farmers may misinterpret symptoms as mineral deficiencies or
drought, mysteriously arising despite adequate nutrients and moisture.
These symptoms do not occur uniformly across a field, but in pockets of
scattered infestation. Below-ground symptoms are more distinctive,
including root knots or galls. Six nematodes are known to infest
Cannabis. All species attack roots except one. Root
knot nematodes embed themselves in roots and induce plants to form giant cells
or syncytia. Syncytia swell into root galls and stimulate formation of
adventitious rootlets, creating a bushy root. Compound galls arise on
larger roots forming "root knots": hypertrophied roots with a rough
surface. The southern root knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita,
has been reported on fiber cultivars in Europe, the former USSR, Brazil, and the
southern US (Goody et al. 1965). M. incognita is the most widely
distributed Meloidogyne spp. worldwide, and attacks hundreds of
hosts. Two other species are rarely reported, the northern root knot
nematode Meliodogyne hapla (Norton 1966; de Meijer 1995) and the Java
root knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica (Decker
1972). The stem nematode, Ditylenchus dipsaci,
uniquely lives above the ground and does not infest roots. Initial
symptoms arise in stems, branches and leaf petioles, which swell and become
chlorotic. Stems subsequently become twisted and distorted with shortened
internodes. Plants are stunted. D. dipsaci is found in North
America, southern Africa, Australia, and temperate areas of Asia. But
Cannabis disease has only been described from fiber varieties in Europe
(Mezzetti 1951). Other nematodes are rarely reported: cyst nematodes
(Heterodera schachtii, H. humuli), needle nematodes
(Paralongidorus maximus), and root lesion nematodes (Pratylenchus
penetrans).
Parasitic Plants
Plants from two genera are genuine Cannabis para-sites. They sink
specialized roots (haustoria) into the host’s xylem and phloem to withdraw
fluids and nu-trients. Broomrapes seem to be the worst. Dewey
(1914) calls branched broomrape (Orobanche ramosa) "the only really
serious enemy to hemp." Barloy & Pelhate (1962) consider a
combi-nation of O. ramosa and Fusarium solani the greatest threat
to Cannabis cultivation in southern France. Broomrapes do most of
their damage underground, their haustoria provide portholes for root rot
fungi. Only briefly do broomrapes send shoots above ground, which quickly
flower and set seed. Rarely Orobanche aegyptiaca and Orobanche
cernua have been cited on fiber and drug cultivars.
Dodder, in contrast to broomrape, sinks haustoria into above-ground parts.
Five species have been reported, mostly Cuscuta campestris (on drug
cultivars in the US and fiber varieties in Europe) and Cuscuta europea
(on fiber cultivars in Europe). Dodder arises as conspicuous tangles
of glabrous yellow filaments, bearing vernacular names such as "gold thread,"
"hair weed," "devil’s ringlet," and "love vine." They twine themselves
around stems and branches. Robust specimens girdle branches and pull down
hosts. Dodder, like broomrape, can vector viruses.
Viruses Viruses
rarely kill Cannabis. They only exist and replicate in living
plants. Viruses can, however, seriously reduce yields. Once
acquired, they are nearly impossible to eradicate. Viruses invade all
parts of plants. Pollen and seed infections transmit viruses to subsequent
generations. Five viral syndromes are described in the
literature. In addition to these naturally-occurring infections, Hartowicz
et al. (1971) screened 22 common plant viruses for their ability to
infect wild hemp. Over half the viruses could infect
Cannabis. The hemp streak virus (HSV) is frequently cited
on fiber cultivars in Europe. Foliar symptoms begin as a pale green
chlorosis. Chlorotic areas soon develop into a series of interveinal
yellow streaks or chevron-stripes. Some-times brown necrotic flecks
appear, each fleck surrounded by a pale green halo. Flecks appear along
the margins and tips of older leaves and often coalesce. Streak symptoms
predominate in moist weather, flecks appear during dry weather. Leaf
margins become wrinkled and leaf tips roll upward, leaflets curl into
spirals. Whole plants assume a "wavy wilt"
appearance. The hemp mozaic virus has been described on
fiber cultivars in Europe and drug cultivars in Pakistan. Symptoms were
described as a gray leaf mosaics. Three other viruses have been cited on
European hemp—the alfalfa mozaic virus (=lucerne mozaic virus), cucumber mozaic
virus, and the arabis mozaic virus. Many insects transmit these viruses as
they feed from plant to plant. According to Ceapoiu (1958), the worst
vectors of Cannabis viruses are bhang aphids (Phorodon cannabis),
greenhouse whiteflies (Trialeudodes vaporariorum), onion thrips
(Thrips tabaci) and green peach aphids (Myzus
persicae).
Bacteria and MLOs The
Cannabis literature concerning bacteria is confused. Dozens of
bacteria have been cited, a morass of misidentifications and taxonomic
synonyms. Species of hemp rettors and marijuana rotters have leaked into
the literature, but they do not cause disease in live plants. Mutualistic
species also appear. Kosslak & Bohlool (1983) isolated Azospirillum
brasilense and A. lipoferum from the rhizosphere of marijuana plants
growing in Hawaii. These diazotrophic bacteria live on the surface of
plant roots where they fix nitrogen for their host. Diazotrophic bacteria
have been sprayed on plants to serve as "biofertilizers" (Fokkema & Heuvel
1986). Only four species of true pathogenic bacteria (with
one species split into four pathovarieties) cause disease in living Cannabis
plants. Bacterial blight by Pseudomonas syringae pv.
cannabina seems to be the most common problem. Symptoms resemble
those caused by brown leaf spot, a fungal disease. Bacterial blight has
only been described on fiber cultivars in Europe. Striatura ulcerosa
produces similar symptoms on stems and is caused by a similar species,
Pseudomonas syringae pv. mori. It, too, is limited to fiber
varieties in Europe. Uncommon diseases include crown gall by
Agrobacterium tumefaciens, bacterial wilt by Erwinia tracheiphila,
xanthomonas leaf spot by Xanthomonas campestris pv. cannabis, and
a mycoplasma-like object described by Phatak et al. (1975).
Abiotic diseases
Diseases from abiotic (non-living) causes often arise suddenly. They
usually resemble diseases caused by living organisms. Some abiotic
diseases have unknown causes, such as "grandine" of hemp. Abiotic
problems also predispose plants to other diseases. Drought-stressed
plants, for instance, become much more susceptible to fungal cankers (McPartland
& Schoeneweiss 1984). The most common abiotic diseases
are nutrient deficiencies (Frank 1988). Generally, deficiencies of mobile
nutrients (N, P, K, Mg, B, Mb) begin in large leaves at the bottom of
plants. Shortages of less mobile nutrients (Mn, Zn, Ca, S, Fe, Cu) usually
begin in young leaves near the top. Pollutants take their
toll. Sulfur dioxide causes interveinal leaf chlorosis and hydrogen
fluoride causes a complete chlorosis in Cannabis (Goidýnich 1959).
Sharma & Mann (1984) found C. sativa ssp. indica near a
Himalayan highway suffering chlorosis and necrosis. Automobile-polluted
plants produced fewer stomates but more trichomes per leaf area. Because
of increased trichome density, Sharma & Mann thought auto pollution
increased THC production. Genetic diseases are
common. BÛcsa (1958) describes some consequences of inbred hemp e.g.
short stature (only 68% the height of normal hemp), shortened lifespan
(vegetative growth 9 weeks shorter than normal plants), production of sterile
seeds, and increased susceptibility to fungal diseases. Crescini (1956)
describes plant fasciation, ramification of stems, and strange pinnate
phyllotaxy in mutagenic, inbred hemp. Borodina & Migal (1987)
illustrate flower fasciation and other teratologies in monoecious plants.
Lai (1985) describes the deleterious effects of inbreeding on yield of fiber and
seed. Sitnik (1981) says "yellow stem" disease in the Ukraine is genetic,
caused by a monogenic recessive mutation. The gene involved has a
pleiotropic effect on plant yields, it decreases biomass, fiber and seed
production.
References
- Agrios, G. 1988. Plant Pathology, 3rd Ed.
Academic Press, N.Y. 803 pp.
- Barloy, J. and J. Pelhate 1962. PremiËres observations
phytopathologiques relatives aux cultures de chanvre en Anjou. Ann.
Epiphyties 13: 117-149.
- Bilgrami, K., S. Jamaluddin and M. A. Rizwi 1981. Fungi of
India: Part II, Host index and addenda. Today & Tomarrow’s
Printers and Publishers, New Delhi. 128 pp.
- BÛcsa I. 1958. A kender beltenyÈsztÈsÈmek œjabb
jelens_gei. N–vÈnytermelÈs 7: 1-10.
- Borodina E. I. and N. D. Migal 1987. Flower teratology
in intersexual hemp plants. Soviet Journal of Developmental Biology
17(4): 262-269.
- Bush Doctor. 1985. Damping Off. Sinsemilla Tips
5(4): 35-39.
- Ceapoiu N. 1958. Cinepa, Studiu monografic.
Editura Academiei Republicii Populare Romine. Bucharest. 652 pp.
- Clarke, R. C. 1987. Cannabis evolution.
unpublished MS thesis, Indiana University, 233 pp.
- Crescini, F. 1956. La fecondazione incestuosa processo
mutageno in Cannabis sativa L. Caryologia (Florentinea) 9(1):
82-92.
- Decker, H. 1972. Plant nematodes and their
control. Kolos Publ. Co., Moscow, 539 pp.
- de Meijer, E. P. M. 1995. Fiber hemp cultivars: a
survey of origin, ancestry, availability and brief agronomic
characteristics. J International Hemp Association 2(2):
66-73.
- Dempsey, J. M. 1975. "Hemp" in Fiber Crops.
University of Florida Press, Gainesville, Florida: 46-89.
- Dewey, L. H. 1914. "Hemp." in U.S.D.A. Yearbook
1913, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington D.C.:
283-347.
- Ferri, F. 1961. Sensibilit· di Sclerotium rolfsii a
vari funghicidi. Phytopath. Medit. 3: 139-140.
- Fokkema, N. J. and J .Van Den Heuvel 1986. Microbiology of
the phyl-losphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 392
pp.
- Frank, M. 1988. Marijuana Grower’s Insider’s Guide.
Red Eye Press, Los Angeles. 371 pp.
- Goidýnich, G. 1959. Manual di Patologia
Vegetale. Edizioni Agricole, Bologna. 713 pp.
- Goody, J. B., M. T. Franklin and D. J. Hooper. 1965. The
nematode parasites of plants catalogued under their hosts.
Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal Co., Bucks, U.K. 214
pp.
- Gutberlet, V. and M. Karus 1995. Parasit”re Krankheiten
und Sch”dlinge an Hanf (Cannabis sativa). Nova Institut, K–ln,
Germany. 57pp.
- Hartowicz, L. E. et al. 1971. Possible
biocontrol of wild hemp. North Central Weed Control Conference, Proceedings
26:69.
- Hennink, S. et al. 1993. "Rassenperspectief van
hennep ten aanzien van opbrengst, produktkwaliteit en EG-subsidies," in
Papier uit hennep van Nederlandse grond, J. M. van Berlo, Ed.
ATO-DLO, Wageningen, The Netherlands: 108-120.
- Hildebrand, D. C. and A. M. McCain. 1978. The use of
various substrates for large scale production of Fusarium oxysporum f.
sp. cannabis inoculum. Phytopathology 68: 1099-1101.
- Hockey, J. F. 1927. Report of the Dominion field
laboratory of plant pathology, Kentville, Nova Scotia. Canada
Department of Agriculture: 28-36.
- Kosslak, R. M. and B. B. Bohlool 1983. Prevalence of
Azospirillum spp. in the rhizosphere of tropical plants. Canadian
Journal of Microbiology 29: 649-652.
- Lai, T. van 1985. Effects of inbreeding on some major
characteristics of hemp. Acta Agronomica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae
34: 77-84.
- Lisson, S. N. and N. J. Mendham 1995. Tasmanian hemp research.
J International Hemp Association 2(2): 82-85.
- McPartland, J. M. 1983. Fungal pathogens of Cannabis
sativa in Illinois. Phytopathology 72: 797.
- McPartland, J. M. 1991. Common names for diseases of
Cannabis sativa L. Plant Disease 75: 226-7.
- McPartland, J. M. 1992. The Cannabis pathogen
project: report of the second five-year plan. Mycological Society of
America Newsletter 43(1): 43.
- McPartland, J. M. 1994. Microbiological contaminants
of marijuana. J International Hemp Association 1(1):
41-44.
- McPartland, J. M. 1995a. Cannabis pathogens VIII:
misidenfications appearing in the literature. Mycotaxon 53:
407-416.
- McPartland, J. M. 1995b. Cannabis pathogens IX:
anamorphs of Botryosphaeria species. Mycotaxon 53:
417-424.
- McPartland, J. M. 1995c. Cannabis pathogens X:
Phoma, Ascochyta and Didymella species. Mycologia
86:870-878.
- McPartland, J. M. 1995d. Cannabis pathogens XI:
Septoria spp. on Cannabis sativa, sensu strico. Sydowia
47: 44-53.
- McPartland, J. M. 1995e. Cannabis pathogens XII:
lumper’s row. Mycotaxon 54:273-279.
- McPartland, J. M. and M. A. Cubeta 1996. New species,
combinations, host associations and location records of fungi associated with
hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). manuscript submitted to
Mycological Research.
- McPartland, J. M. and S. Hughes 1994. Cannabis
pathogens VII: a new species, Schiffnerula cannabis. Mycologia
86: 867-869.
- McPartland, J. M. and D. F. Schoeneweiss 1984. Hyphal
morphology of Botryosphaeria dothidea in vessels of unstressed and
drought-stressed Betula alba. Phytopathology 74: 358-362.
- Mezzetti, A. 1951. Alcune alterazioni della canapa
manifestatesi nella decorsa annata agraria. Quaderni del Centro di Studi
per le Ricerche sulla Lavorazione Coltivazione ed Economia della Canapa
(Laboratorio Sperimentale di Patologia Vegetale di Bologna), No. 11. 18
pp.
- Norton, D. C. 1966. Additions to the known hosts of
Meloidogyne hapla. Plant Disease Reporter 50:
523-524.
- Noviello, C. et al. 1990. Lotta biologica contro
Cannabis sativa mediante l’impiego di Fusarium oxysporum f. sp.
cannabis. Annali della Facolta di Scienze Agrarie della Universita
degli Studi di Napoli, Portici 24: 33-44.
- Pandotra, V. R. and K. S. M. Sastry 1967. Wilt: a new
disease of hemp in India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 37:
520.
- Phatak, H. C. et al. 1975. Mycoplasma-like
bodies associated with Cannabis phyllody. Phytopath. Z. 83:
281-284.
- Sharma, G. K. and S. K. Mann 1984. Variation in
vegetative growth and trichomes in Cannabis sativa L. (marihuana) in
response to environmental pollution. J. Tennessee Academy of Science
59: 38-40.
- Sitnik, V. P. 1981. Inheritance of charcters controlled
by the pleiotropic effect of the gene for yellow stem in hemp. Selektsiya i
Semenovodstvo No. 47: 46-49.
- Synnott, K. [Ed.] 1941. Plant diseases. Notes
contributed by the biological branch. Agricultural Gazette of New South
Wales 52(7): 369-371, 384; 52(8): 435-438.
- Termorshuizen, A. J. 1991. Literatuuronderzoek over
ziekten bij nieuwe potenti‘le gewassen. IPO-DLO Rapport No. 91-08,
Instituut voor Planteziektenkundig Onderzoek, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 18
pp.
- Van der Werf, H. M. G. and W. C. A. Van Geel 1994.
Vezelhennep als papiergrondstof, teeltonderzoek 1987-1993. (Fiber
hemp as a raw material for paper, crop research 1987-1993. Report nr. 177,
PAGV, Lelystad, The Netherlands, 62 pp.
- Van der Werf, H. M. G. et al. 1995. Agronomic
research on hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) in the Netherlands, 1987-1993.
Journal of the International Hemp Association 2: 14-17
-excerpted from Biocontrol of Cannabis diseases and pests
due in 1997.

Cannabis stem cross section (courtesy of VIR)
|