Who is June Cleaver Today?
Study: June Cleaver has nothing on today's moms
For all the rush of modern life, recent research suggests that mothers are doing a better
job than they may think, at least by historical standards.
According to a University of Maryland study, today's mothers spend more hours
focused on their children than their mothers did 40 years ago, often imagined as
the golden era of June Cleaver, the ever-cheerful, cookie-baking mom on the TV
series “Leave it to Beaver.”
| Time with children
HOURS PER WEEK
Married mothers:
47 in 1975
51 in 2000
Single mothers:
50 in 1975
44 in 2000
Married fathers:
21 in 1975
33 in 2000
|
|
In 1965, mothers spent 10.2 hours a week tending primarily to their children
– feeding them, reading with them or playing games, for example – according to
the study's analysis of detailed time diaries kept by thousands of Americans.
That number dipped in the 1970s and 1980s, rose in the 1990s and now is higher
than ever, at nearly 14.1 hours a week.
This is especially striking because it is at odds with how today's mothers
view their lives: About half of those interviewed said they did not have enough
time with their children.
“It's almost like it doesn't matter how much they do, they feel they do not
do enough,” said sociologist Suzanne Bianchi, the study's lead author.
The research offers a look into a generation of great change for mothers. Fewer
women lead the kind of life romanticized in the 1950s and 1960s – with a
breadwinner father and homemaker mother. Yet while mothers' hours of direct time
with children have increased, so have their expectations.
They have given up hours in other parts of their lives to make more time with
their children – cutting back on housework, which was down more than 40 percent
over 38 years. They also trimmed their free time – and to some extent their
sleep – as they increasingly multi-tasked. Multi-tasking hours roughly doubled.
“This is part of the burden of this generation of parents: enormously high
expectations for how children develop, how they feel about themselves, how they
achieve and how successful they are in the world,” said William Doherty, a
family studies professor at the University of Minnesota.
Noteworthy for both its conclusions and comprehensiveness, the time diaries
show dramatic changes for fathers, who have nearly tripled the hours they spend
focused primarily on their children. “They're doing more but still dwarfed by
what mothers are doing,” said co-author Melissa Milkie.
In all, the research, published in the fall, tells a complex story of family
trade-offs and cultural shifts – over a span of years when U.S. mothers entered
the work force as never before and the number of families headed by single
mothers jumped markedly. This was also a time when families had fewer children
and parents were more educated.
“There is a greater stake in each child succeeding,” Milkie said.
Women – especially those in the middle-and upper-middle income brackets –
feel that to be good mothers, they need to be experts on child development and
spend more time interacting with their children, said Sharon Hays of the
University of Southern California. Hays, who wrote a book on the subject, calls
this “the culture of intensive mothering.”
But the world that families live in has changed, too. There has been an
explosion of lessons and athletic teams for children as young as 3 years old.
There are also more concerns about safety and crime, which affect how close
parents stay to their children.
Not all time spent with children is the same, so the Maryland researchers
looked at it in several ways.
There is primary time, when a child is the focus of a parent's attention.
There is secondary time – helping with homework, for example, while cooking
dinner. Then there is a third category: just being with children.
Looking back to 1975 – the earliest year that diaries captured this level of
detail – they found that mothers gave more time than in the past.
For married mothers, hours with children rose from 47 a week in 1975 to 51 a
week in 2000. For married fathers, the increase was greater: from 21 to 33 hours
a week. Time spent by single mothers slipped from 50 hours a week to 44.
What the researchers could not capture was what they think of as
“accessibility”: when a parent might be uninvolved but is around to be called on
– inside the house, for example, when the children are in the backyard.
This may help explain why some mothers still feel their time with children is
not enough, Doherty said. “You may get home from work at 4:30 and spend hours
interacting with your child, but you may feel bad that you weren't around all
day.”
Sociologist Kathleen Gerson, of New York University, points out that parents
of the 1960s worried about mothers smothering their children with attention.
Now, she said, “the concern is: Are children getting as much face time as
they need, as much quality time?”
Time-mindedness is clearly part of family life.
In Fairfax County, Va., there is Janine O'Rourke, a working mother of two who
sometimes feels weeknights are too heavy on homework-checking and meal-making,
with too few trips to the playground and evenings of board games. “It just seems
like a lot of routine,” she said.
Like many parents, O'Rourke and her husband include their children in their
free time. Fridays are movie nights: the family of four, at home, with popcorn
and Junior Mints. Weekends are for family time, too, even if some outings are
only to Costco.
There is Lisa Pierce, who thinks of herself as “a stay-at-home mom who never
stays home,” instead driving to schools, running errands, doing volunteer work,
shuttling to sports or Scouting activities.
Pierce said she generally feels she gives her children enough time. But one
recent day, she found herself reconsidering the kind of time she was giving.
It had snowed, and her children were out of school. So she took them with her
– for errands, shopping, haircuts. Then she felt a tinge of regret.
Maybe she should have played in the snow with them instead, she thought. Or
taken them to a movie – something fun. “I spend all of this time doing things
for them and not doing things with them,” she said.
That, she would change.
Cynthie Bush often works 9½-hour days as a teacher, which leaves her thinking
about how to make the most of what is left. Several years ago, she changed jobs
and cut her commute from 40 minutes to five.
Then she and her husband decided to give up some housework – the four hours a
weekend they had spent scrubbing bathrooms and cleaning floors. They wanted to
give the time to their children – ages 4 and 7 – so they hired out the job, in
spite of the cost.
Bush, 36, has not found the time to reclaim her love of soccer and track or
her tennis games with her husband.
“The little time we have,” Bush said, “we want to give the kids.”
It was that sense of time's limitations, she said, that made it harder to get
out the door when she and a friend recently went to a PTA book talk by author
Devra Renner.
Later, Bush chuckled to herself as she thought about the evening: She had
almost been too guilty about missed time to get to a lecture about “Mommy
Guilt.”