Auto bailout plan collapses in Senate
December 12, 2008
Republicans balk at $14 billion deal, leaving GM, Chrysler's fate in the air
WASHINGTON
– The Senate last night abandoned efforts to fashion a government
rescue of the American automobile industry, as Senate Republicans
refused to support a bill endorsed by the White House and
congressional Democrats.
The failure to reach agreement on Capitol Hill raised a specter
of financial collapse for General Motors and Chrysler, which some
experts say may not be able to survive until the end of the year.
After Senate Republicans balked at supporting a $14 billion auto
rescue plan approved by the House on Wednesday, negotiators worked
late into the night to broker a compromise. They deadlocked over
Republican demands for steep cuts in pay and benefits by the United
Automobile Workers union in 2009.

Associated Press
Workers exited the Chrysler truck assembly
plant in Warren, Mich., yesterday. An auto industry bailout
stalled over proposed steep pay cuts by the auto workers
union.
|

PAUL SANCYA / Associated
Press
General Motors Corp. headquarters could be
seen through the doorway of an empty warehouse in Detroit on
Wednesday. Burdened by heavy debt, GM has said it might not
survive the next month. |
The failure
in Congress to provide a financial lifeline for GM and Chrysler was
a bruising defeat for President Bush in the waning weeks of his
term, and also for President-elect Barack Obama, who earlier
yesterday urged Congress to act to avoid a further loss of jobs in
an already deeply debilitated economy.
“It's over with,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada
said on the Senate floor, after it was clear that a deal could not
be reached. “I dread looking at Wall Street tomorrow. It's not going
to be a pleasant sight.”
Reid added: “This is going to be a very, very bad Christmas for a
lot of people as a result of what takes place here tonight.”
The Republican leader, Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, said:
“We have had before us this whole question of the viability of the
American automobile manufacturers. None of us want to see them go
down, but very few of us had anything to do with the dilemma that
they have created for themselves.”
McConnell added: “The administration negotiated in good faith
with the Democratic majority a proposal that was simply unacceptable
to the vast majority of our side because we thought it frankly
wouldn't work.”
Moments later, the Senate failed to win the 60 votes need to
bring up the auto rescue plan for consideration. The Senate voted
52-35.
The White House said it would consider alternatives but offered
no assurances.
| SHOULD CONGRESS BAIL OUT
THE AUTO INDUSTRY?
PRO
GM, Ford and Chrysler employ 239,000 people in the U.S.
The country's extensive network of auto suppliers has
more than 600,000 workers. Economists say the industry
supports about 3 million jobs. The economy cannot afford
more job losses.
Despite its long-term problems, the auto industry is now
a victim of the global credit crunch. Automakers have
been working to adapt to a changing consumer market, but
they need immediate help to survive the current economic
crisis.
Chapter 11 is not an option. Consumers will not buy cars
from companies in bankruptcy.
The auto industry is the backbone of U.S. manufacturing
and the cornerstone of the blue-collar middle class.
CON
Automakers' problems are their own doing, born of bad
business decisions, uncompetitive labor agreements and
vehicles that Americans have decided are second-rate.
Bailout will only postpone the inevitable.
The failure of one or more of the companies is necessary
if the free market is to work properly.
Including automakers in the bailout could attract a
string of other ailing industries looking for money.
By having the automakers go through Chapter 11,
high-cost contracts with labor unions could be canceled.
| |
“It's
disappointing that Congress failed to act tonight,” said Tony
Fratto, the deputy press secretary. “We think the legislation we
negotiated provided an opportunity to use funds already appropriated
for automakers, and presented the best chance to avoid a disorderly
bankruptcy while ensuring taxpayer funds only go to firms whose
stakeholders were prepared to make difficult decisions to become
viable. We will evaluate our options in light of the breakdown in
Congress.”
The White House almost certainly will face some pressure to act
on its own to prop up GM and Chrysler, an idea that administration
officials have resisted for weeks, but it is unclear that enough
money remains in the Treasury's $700 billion financial system
stabilization fund to do so.
Until now, the Federal Reserve also has shown no willingness to
step in to aid the auto industry, but Democrats have argued that it
has the authority to do so and some said the central bank may have
no choice but to prevent the automakers from bankruptcy proceedings
that could have devastating ripple effects.
The rescue plan approved by the House on Wednesday by a vote of
237-170 would have extended $14 billion in loans to the troubled
automakers and required them to submit to broad government oversight
directed by a car czar to be named by Bush.
But even before the House vote, Senate Republicans voiced strong
opposition to the plan. At a luncheon with White House chief of
staff Josh Bolten, they rebuffed his entreaties for support.
Yesterday morning, McConnell dealt a death blow to the
House-passed bill, giving a speech on the Senate floor in which he
said that Republican senators would not support it largely because
it was not tough enough.
“In the end, its greatest single flaw is that it promises
taxpayer money today for reforms that may or may not come tomorrow,”
McConnell said.
But McConnell also held out slim hope for a compromise suggesting
that Republicans could rally around a set of proposals by Sen. Bob
Corker (R-Tenn.), who said that the bill did not set stiff enough
requirements for the automakers.
Obama, whose transition team had consulted with congressional
Democrats and the Bush White House on the efforts to help the
automakers, used his opening remarks at a news conference in Chicago
to urge Congress to act.
“I believe our government
should provide short-term assistance to the auto industry to avoid a
collapse while holding the companies accountable and protecting
taxpayer interests,” Obama said. “The legislation in Congress right
now is an important step in that direction, and I'm hopeful that a
final agreement can be reached this week.”
But in Washington, there was little appetite among Senate
Republicans for yet another multibillion-dollar bailout of private
companies. Still, with the Democrats and the White House eager to
reach a deal, Corker's proposal became the subject of intense
negotiations well into the evening.
Under his plan, the automakers would have been required by March
31 to slash their debt obligations by two-thirds – an enormous sum
given that GM alone has more than $60 billion in outstanding debt.
The automakers also would have been required to cut wages and
benefits to match the average hourly wage and benefits of Nissan,
Toyota and Honda employees based in the United States, and the
companies would have had to impose equivalent work rules.
It was over this proposal that the talks ultimately deadlocked,
with Republicans demanding that the automakers meet that goal by a
certain date in 2009 and Democrats and the union urging that the
deadline wait until 2011 when the UAW contract expires.
GM, Chrysler and industry experts have said that the two
companies likely would not survive until the end of this month
without government aid, and the companies already had agreed to
carry out sweeping reorganization plans in exchange for the help.
The negotiations over Corker's proposals broke up about 8 p.m.,
and Corker left to meet with Republican senators to brief them on
the developments. The Republicans emerged from their meeting an hour
later having decided they would not agree to a deal. Several of them
blamed the autoworkers union.
“It sounds like the UAW blew it up,” said Sen. David Vitter,
R-La.
Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama, the senior Republican on the
banking committee and a leading critic of the auto bailout proposal,
said: “We're hoping that the Democrats will continue to negotiate,
but I think we have reached a point that labor has got to give. If
they want a bill, they can get one.”
Your humble Ace Reporter
Bob