Could salt water fuel cars?
April 21, 2008
You may have heard about an invention created by a 63-year-old named John Kanzius
that claims to create an alternative fuel out of salt water. Through sheer serendipity,
Kanzius, a former broadcast engineer, found out something incredible -- under the
right conditions, salt water can burn at high temperatures.
Yes, you're seeing water burn.
Kanzius' journey toward surprise inspiration began with a leukemia diagnosis
in 2003. Faced with the prospect of debilitating chemotherapy, he decided he would
try to invent a better alternative for destroying cancerous cells. What he came up
with is his radio frequency generator (RFG), a machine that generates radio waves
and focuses them into a concentrated area. Kanzius used the RFG to heat small metallic
particles inserted into tumors, destroying the tumors without harming normal cells.
But what does cancer treatment have to do with burning salt water?
During a demonstration of the RFG, an observer noticed that it was causing
water in a nearby test tube to condense. If the RFG could make water condense,
it could theoretically separate salt out of seawater. Perhaps, then, it could
be used to desalinize water, an issue of global proportions. The old seaman's
adage "Water, water everywhere and not a drop to drink" applies inland as well:
Some nations are drying up and their populations suffering from thirst, yet the
world is 70 percent ocean water. An effective means of removing salt from salt
water could save countless lives. So it's no surprise that Kanzius trained his
RFG on the goal of salt water desalinization.
During his first test, however, he noticed a surprising side effect. When
he aimed the RFG at a test tube filled with seawater, it sparked. This is not
a normal reaction by water.
Kanzius tried the test again, this time lighting a paper towel and touching
it to the water while the water was in the path of the RFG. He got an even bigger
surprise -- the test tube ignited and stayed alight while the RFG was turned on.
News of the experiment was generally met with allegations of it being a hoax,
but after Penn State University chemists got their hands on the RFG and tried
their own experiments, they found it was indeed true. The RFG could ignite and
burn salt water. The flame could reach temperatures as high as 3,000 degrees
Fahrenheit and burn as long as the RFG was on and aimed at it.
But how could salt water possibly ignite? Why don't careless litterbugs who
flick lit cigarette butts into the sea set the whole planet aflame? It all has
to do with hydrogen. In its normal state, salt water has a stable composition
of sodium chloride (the salt) and hydrogen and oxygen (the water). But the radio
waves from Kanzius' RFG disrupt that stability, degrading the bonds that hold
the chemicals in salt water together. This releases the volatile hydrogen
molecules, and the heat output from the RFG ignites them and burns them indefinitely.
So will our cars soon run on salt water instead of gasoline? Read the next
page for some of the hurdles that would have to be overcome for salt water
to fuel cars.
Since the oil crisis of the 1970s revealed the danger of our dependence on
fossil fuels, chemists, engineers, physicists and charlatans alike have tried
to come up with alternatives. In this search, John Kanzius is not the first to
come up with water as a potential fuel. In 2006, a company out of Clearwater,
Fla., called Hydrogen Technology Applications debuted Aquygen, a gas made up
of hydrogen separated from water through an electrical shock. This hydrogen gas,
when mixed with regular gasoline, creates a more efficient fuel than gasoline
alone by burning what is normally emitted as waste and using it for power. HTA's
president, Denny Klein, claims the mixture improves gas mileage by as much as
one-and-a-half times and reduces pollution [source: World Net Daily].
Klein created a hybrid vehicle out of a 1994 Ford Escort. This vehicle used
electricity from the alternator to create the impulse needed for hydrogen separation.
It then sent the gas into the fuel tank for mixing. But while the hydrogen gas produced
was fuel-efficient, it was also highly volatile, meaning it could easily explode.
There is another design flaw in Aquygen, one that it shares with the Kanzius RFG.
Both struggle with the energy input to energy output ratio -- or efficiency. This huge
stumbling block causes many to view inventions like Aquygen and the RFG as useless
science. While the RFG produces a hydrogen flame that burns stably, the amount of
energy it puts out is less than the amount of energy needed to power the RFG. In
this sense, any energy that comes out of the salt-water flame cannot be considered
a source of power. It's just a manifestation of the energy being put into it, only
in a lesser amount. This makes it unlikely that the RFG could produce a real, viable
source of fuel.
It’s possible that someday the salt water that carries ships laden with
fuel sources like coal will be a fuel source itself.

Just about any electrical or chemical process puts out some kind of energy, for example,
in the form of heat. In power sources, the goal is to create more energy than is used
in the process. Once you consider how few sources of energy can produce more energy
than their process requires, the difficulty of such a quest, and the maddening frustration
that accompanies it, becomes clearer. It's a little like alchemy -- the quest to turn
ordinary metals into precious ones.
Like Isaac Newton and his falling apple, or Alexander Fleming and his accidental
penicillin spores, John Kanzius stumbled onto his discovery. But unlike Newton and
Fleming, Kanzius is yet to be validated by history. Until the energy input versus
output ratio can be overcome -- if, indeed, it can -- Kanzius's exciting discovery
will remain just that: an exciting discovery. But with a major university behind it,
Kanzius's RFG isn't down for the count. The RFG's inventor can also look forward
to further research into other applications for his machine.
Your humble Ace Reporter
Bob