The Delegation Boomerang
August 1, 2007
Paul Glen
-- Have you ever noticed that delegation doesn’t always work? Have you ever given one
of your subordinates a task and a few days later found it back on your to-do list? I
call this the delegation boomerang effect.
When this happens, most managers like to think of themselves as victims. I often hear
something like, “My people just aren’t up to the job, so I have to do it myself. Woe is me.”
But this is silly. Usually, it’s not that the people can’t do the job, but that the manager
doesn’t want them to do the job. The manager wants the job for himself, no matter how
much he protests to the contrary.
The boomerang effect happens because managers get stymied by the emotional obstacles to
giving away responsibility and authority. While they tell the subordinates that they want
to delegate decision-making power or cool technical work, they really want it for themselves
and find ways to take it back. Sometimes the subordinates give it back because they don’t want
the responsibility, the work or the risk of accepting blame. But sometimes it happens because
managers and subordinates have differing assumptions about what has been delegated, the degree
of empowerment provided and the level of individual initiative expected.
The problems with this scenario are fairly obvious. A big part of the point of management
is to make a group of people productive by enabling parallel activity, but when delegation
fails, work becomes single-threaded. This situation is not just a problem for managers, but
also for subordinates. Generally, technical people want to accept responsibility, take on
tasks, learn and grow. But when delegation fails, subordinates see no opportunity to grow.
They lose initiative and become dependent.
So, how does this happen? I’ve seen three general modalities.
1. Status reporting becomes decision-making. Most commonly, a subordinate starts
out offering a status report. Next thing you know, it seems the boss has a decision to make,
effectively taking back responsibility. It happens either because the subordinate asks for
it or because the boss feels uncomfortable accepting information without taking some sort
of action. But when this happens, the boss is subliminally telling the subordinate that he
expects a low level of initiative.
2. Authority reverts to recommendation. When you’ve delegated decision-making
authority, sometimes subordinates come back with recommendations and analysis rather than
decisions. Here the subordinate is asking to be relieved of authority.
3. Micromanagement discourages initiative. Here the boss becomes so intrusive
in monitoring progress that the subordinate assumes that the boss doesn’t really want to
delegate after all and lets him take back control.
So, how do you make delegated tasks stay where you put them?
1. Know yourself. Try to be aware of how you feel about delegation. If you are
ambivalent about it, reflect on why and whether you can reliably delegate this task.
2. Don’t catch the boomerang. When someone offers you a status report, rather
than telling him what to do, ask him what he plans to do. When he offers recommendations,
thank him for the update and ask him what he plans to do. And resist the temptation to
micromanage.
3. Clarify the level of initiative you expect when you delegate a task. Explain
whether you are delegating authority or just a task. Ask whether the person is comfortable
accepting this degree of delegation. Make sure that you both agree on expectations.
4. Say it again. When someone tries to give you back a task, reiterate the level
of initiative you described at the outset. Remind the person of your initial agreement.
With a bit of self-awareness and discipline, you can make delegation work. You need not
be a victim of the delegation boomerang effect.
Your humble Ace Reporter
Bob