Overshoot (Malthus was an optimist)
Thomas Robert Malthus, 1766-1834, famously observed that human population, if
unchecked, would grow faster than its food supply. He argued that
education in "moral restraint" might prevent starvation from being the operative
check on population growth. It is implicit in his writings that uncontrolled
population growth, failing "moral restraint", would stall near the natural
limits of the food supply. The population would remain stable thereafter, with
many people living on the edge of starvation. But general undernourishment of a
stable population is not a likely result of the current fantastic expansion of
the human population. Like many who have commented on population growth, Malthus
did not understand overshoot.
A species may greatly overshoot the long term carrying capacity of its
environment. (Its population may become greatly larger than its environment can
sustain.) Overshoot becomes possible when a species encounters a rich and
previously unexploited stock of resources that promotes its reproduction.
The creation of stocks is due to ongoing geological and biological
activity. A resource stock forms when a part of the daily production of a
resource, a flow, accumulates slowly without being exploited, perhaps
over millions of years. An enormous stock of a resource may accumulate before it
encounters a species that can exploit it easily. After such an encounter, only
predation and disease limit reproduction of the species.
Without significant predation or disease, and while large amounts of the
stock remain easily available, the population of a species can grow to a size
hundreds of times that which can be supported by the flows that created the
stock. The daily production of a resource is a mere trickle compared to the
flood available from a stored accumulation.
After a long period during which more of the stock is consumed each day by
the growing population than was consumed on the preceding day, the stock starts
to exhaust. Deposits of the stock become harder to find. Less can be obtained
from the stock each day than the day before.
The time now remaining before complete exhaustion of the stock may be much
shorter than the time that elapsed between encounter with the stock and the
first signs of approaching scarcity. Soon, individuals begin to compete
desperately for the remaining stock. To stay alive, they resort to
alternative resources of lower and lower quality. By consuming the sources of
flow, they destroy the capacity of their environment to produce the original
flow. They also destroy the capacity of their environment to produce flows of
alternative resources. Most of the population dies.
Ecologists call the resulting collapse of the population a crash, or
die off. As a result of a crash, the carrying capacity for the overshot
species, and for other species, becomes less than if the overshot species had
not stumbled onto the stock in the first place. The population may remain at a
very low level for a shorter or longer time--or forever. Because of the
exponential nature of population growth in the presence of abundant resources, a
single generation of the population--the most numerous generation-- experiences
abundance in its youth, starvation in maturity, and premature death for most of
its members. "Crash" is an apt term--a population crash can happen very
quickly..
Malthus thought that population would approach a sustainable limit, then
hover there, with many people living in poverty and misery. He did not imagine
overshoot and sudden collapse. He did not understand that technology was
converting mineral concentrations and much of the biosphere into windfall stocks
that would stimulate rapid population growth. Now, two hundred years after
Malthus, humans have multiplied their numbers far beyond any sustainable limit,
and the end of the windfall stocks is in sight.
1) David R. Klein. The introduction, increase, and crash of reindeer on
St. Matthew Island. J. Wildlife Management. 32: 350-367 (1968). Text
on-line at http://dieoff.org/page80.htm.
2) William R. Catton, Jr., Malthus: More relevant than ever, August 1998.
http://www.npg.org/forum_series/catton_malthus.htm
3)
Elwell, Frank W., 2001, Malthus' Social Theory, Retrieved October 21, 2003,
4) Thomas Robert Malthus. An essay on the principle of population, a
view of its past and present effects on human happiness, Sixth
edition,1826. London: John Murray, Albemarle Street. (First edition 1798.)
Complete text of the sixth edition on-line at
http://www.econlib.org/library/Malthus/malPlong.html.
5) William R. Catton, Jr., Overshoot: The ecological basis of revolutionary
change, University of Illinois Press, 1980. Available at
Overshoot: The Ecological Basis of Revolutionary Change
6)Oil Depletion