When does 'Yes', become Rape?
Men get screwed by law...
Courts are slowly redefining consent.
Betsy Hart, February 16, 2007
“A Time Limit on Rape,” a news story by Jeninne Lee-St. John in Time magazine, opens with
this question: If a woman consents to sex with a man but then withdraws that consent during
the sex act itself, can he still be convicted of rape and sentenced to prison if, essentially,
he doesn't stop fast enough?
“The answer depends on where you live,” Lee-St. John writes in answer to her own question.
In seven states, she writes, courts “have ruled that a woman may withdraw her consent at any
time and if a man doesn't stop he is committing rape.”
My home state of Illinois is the first to pass legislation giving a woman that “protection.”
Gee, I feel so much safer now. I mean, there's a law!
Sheesh.
Feminists and “victim advocates” argue that without being able to change her mind and say no
during sexual intercourse itself, “there is no recourse for a woman who begins to feel pain or
realizes her partner isn't wearing a condom or has HIV,” writes Lee-St. John. No recourse? Now,
I'm not sure how they think a woman is going to suddenly get that latter piece of information
only after sex has begun. But are these feminists really saying that all men are such incredible
brutes they wouldn't stop, if they found their partner was uncomfortable for some reason, without
the threat of prison? Just what kind of men are these feminists involved with?
But more likely is that this is what many in the sisterhood want to think of men because it fits
with the “man-bad, woman-good” theory of life they consistently project to the world.
In a complicated Maryland case that may soon make it to the state's highest court, a young man
and woman both testified that she told him to stop during the sex act and that he did so within
seconds, and without completion. What preceded those agreed-upon events is murky; what matters is
that the jury asked the judge during deliberations, “Is it rape if a female changed her mind during
the sex to which she consented and the man continued. . . .” The judge said it was for them to decide.
(The defendant, who appealed that conviction to the state's Supreme Court, currently is serving a
5-year prison sentence for rape.)
But the Maryland appellate court has essentially said no, once intercourse has begun with a woman's
consent, it's too late to call it rape and put him in prison if he doesn't stop immediately. So now
feminists are “inflamed,” according to Lee St.-John. They say they will push to change the law if the
high court doesn't strike down the appellate court ruling.
Huh?
To establish that a woman can fully and even enthusiastically agree to sexual intercourse and then
in the middle of it, if she chooses differently, he must stop “immediately” or he goes to prison, does
women no favors.
For one thing, as Lee-St. John notes, what qualifies as “immediately”? Can we really count on a law
to be fully “protective” in the moment, anyway? The seduction game can be incredibly, even wonderfully,
daring, complicated and nuanced. This shouldn't be a news flash. So, should there be some officially
sanctioned signal, or perhaps a notarized paper she has on hand, to show, “I really mean it! You've got
two seconds?”
Talk about creating a tangled web.
Sadly, what the feminists are advocating here degrades the real crime of rape. And, it infantilizes
women. At some point – gasp – we are responsible for the choices we make, and for managing the
consequences of the choices we make. That's what's empowering. We women are grown-ups, aren't we?
I'm not sure. There used to be some generally accepted rules of engagement between civilized men
and women. No, they weren't always followed, but they provided something of a known playing field.
Now we just involve the courts when a woman's sensibilities are offended because, like very young
children, we can't possibly be expected to manage those offended sensibilities ourselves.
And that's what's considered “progress” for women.
Hart is the author of the “It Takes a Parent: How the Culture of
Pushover Parenting is Hurting Our Kids – and What to Do About It.”