When Did a Cubicle Become Such a Prize? And Other Rants
By Paul Kimmel, 2005
I have said it before and I will say it again: I am lucky. I travel all over the place helping
smart people build software and I always learn a lot from these smart people. Now, I am
getting luckier because as I slowly approach the age when a motorcycle seems like a good
idea (can you say mid-life crisis?); I have become more receptive and better at listening.
I am beginning to suspect that wisdom means learning to determine what you can change and
what you have to tolerate. I still have a ways to go, but I am getting better.
You might ask: Why are you telling me this? Well, because there is still a lot of dumb
stuff to deal with and before I become senile and forget that those certain things bug me,
I want to write them down. Why do you want to read them? Assuming you're an amateur student
of human nature, I suspect that you might find some amusement in my suffering. After all,
that's my job: to inform and entertain—and if I run out of ideas, to make you feel better
by showing you how much better off you are than I am.
If you are sentimentally inclined, then depart now; but if you occasionally watch Jerry
Springer (Who are those people, and where do they live?) and laugh hysterically at the
suffering of others, then pour yourself a cool one and read on.
Proper Care and Feeding of Contractors
I founded my company in 1990. My first contract rate was $10 per hour. (Don't laugh.)
Basically, we used sonar to track fish that got trapped in hydroelectric wheels. You see,
the DNR (Department of Natural Resources) requires that hydroelectric energy producers
replace the fish that are chopped up in hydroelectric wheels. My job was to make sure that
the PC running Quarterdeck, the DAT tape recorder, oscilloscope, and dot-matrix printer were
still running, even late at night.
Ever been to a hydroelectric facility late at night? Rats. Lots and lots of rats. Huge, New
York-sized rats. Every dead fish is devoured late at night by rats large enough to haul your
child way. Why is this relevant? The answer is that the customer at the rat-dam treated me
better than any other customer since.
Don't get me wrong. I don't mean my customers are overtly mean; they are just compelled to
follow ridiculous rules for the treatment of contractors.
But When Did a Cubicle Become Such a Prize?
Many companies put contractors in a bullpen, separated from the full-timers, like we
have an infectious disease. The disease is that we left-brained contractors think we are
right-brained businessmen and that employees are underpaid suckers. Companies down-size,
right-size, and outsource at a devastating pace. Why would anyone tie their fortunes to one
company when companies do not feel any allegiance to their employees? Well, this is the disease
that some companies think contractors will spread.
The result is that contractors are paid $50, $100, $150, or even more dollars per hour,
which may be several times the pay rate of the average employee. Hell, $100 an hour may be
more than company officers make. How do companies offset this financial disparity? Employees
get cubes, and contractors sit in broom closets with no windows. But when did a cubicle become
such a prize? And, most cubes are only half cubes, big enough to contain a chair, a computer
with a 15-inch monitor, and a couple of pictures. For $50 or $100 an hour more, I will sit in
the Path station in Hoboken next to a guy who has urinated in his pants.
Cubes aren't the only reward employees get. While working for the state of Texas when our
honorable President was governor, I had to park on the roof of a garage in downtown Austin,
Texas. The average temperature had exceeded 100 degrees over a period of 40 days. Employees
got to park on lower, covered floors. Do you know how hot black leather gets in 110 degree
sunshine? Well, neither do I, but my Jeep's temperature sensor was totally pegged. I am guessing
something in the 140 degree range. You know what, though? I will take 140 degrees and a Grand
Cherokee over a Saturn and a covered parking level any day.
Do you know how little Texas state employees make? When did covered parking become such a prize?
When I was a military policeman in the army, we got medals as a kind of extra compensation.
I made $600 per month, but I almost caught a Soviet spy, guarded Lieutenant General "Sam"
Wetzel—the general who had Colin Powell's job as V Corp commander just before he got it—and I
got to learn about terrorism up close and personal. I am glad for the experience, but I couldn't
live on the $600 bucks a month anymore. Like cubes and covered parking, medals aren't that great
of a reward, and I suspect company officers wouldn't accept anything less than handsome
compensation packages.
What Nitwit Ordered the 15-Inch Monitors?
Who are these retards that think a 15-inch monitor and 256 megabytes of RAM are equally suitable
for secretaries, developers, and janitors, but CEOs need 42-inch plasma screens? Have you ever
tried to do UML modeling on a 15-inch monitor? Go to dell.com and look at Michael Dell's computer.
Michael Dell is great. I love the story. I love the computers. (I am writing this on a Dell
Inspiron 600m.) But what does Michael Dell need with a multi-processor, 12 gigabyte, 8 gigahertz
PC with a 7 trillion byte SCSI hard-drive and a 62-inch plasma monitor? He isn't doing UML
modeling, and he spends most of his time on his Globstar flying around the world. What twit
gave Michael Dell a $72,000 workstation when a Bluetooth etch-a-sketch would do? I know Mike
is trying to get other CEOs to buy more computer than they need by having a mine-is-bigger-than-yours
fest on the Web site, but it's killing us poor architects with 15-inch monitors.
Companies really don't seem to understand that if we programmers are to build them multi-million
dollar software solutions that maybe providing us with more than $79 monitors is a good idea. You
think I am kidding. I got DFS (Dell Financial Services) credit just to replace the lousy hardware
companies provide me. There are a lot of quietly updated computers left in my wake.
Office Party Stupidity
Have you ever been uninvited to an office party? I have. I know what you might be thinking, and it's
not because I am boring. All of us clever computer nerds are party killers, right? No, the reason I was
uninvited is because I am a contractor.
Uninviting temporary employees to office functions is almost as dumb as 15-inch monitors. The only
difference between a contractor and employee is that contractors generally are paid more in terms of
direct compensation, but everyone is on the same team. Duh!
When Jimi T from Groves Motor Sports in Mason, Michigan delivered my Kawasaki KDX 220R, I invited him
in and asked him if he wanted a beer. He was acting as a temporary consultant,
but I treated him like a guest. Even though in my excitement—remember mid-life crisis—I might have paid
a bit more than I had to, Jimi T was doing me a favor, and I was appreciative. Cost was not a consideration
that drove how I treated my guest.
Guests are guests, whether they are multi-billionaires like Bill Gates, lowly architect-developers like
me, or Visa holders from India, and they should be treated accordingly. Why a company would un-invite
contractors to company parties, team building events, or decent parking is beyond me, and it is petty.
Contractors are as committed as employees. Many contractors stay on projects for months and years, often
long after key employees leave, and they are just as dedicated. Remember, also, that many contractors
need to be away from family and friends to help their clients put one in the win column. Being inhospitable
to them is boorish and stupid.
Experts and Homers
I never tell anyone that I am an expert. I am pretty sure that Anders Hejlsberg has at least 15 IQ
points on me and is in another world when it comes to architecting compilers, languages, and frameworks.
Anders is better than I am, but Anders probably will never be available to you. (He gave us C#; isn't that
enough?)
Note: Did you know that Anders was originally a Borland employee but now he is so important that his last
name is in MS Word's spell-checking dictionary? That is what is referred to as having juice.
What I do know is that I have been writing books since 1992 and have published about a dozen works on
object-oriented languages. I have been writing articles and software for 20 years. As a result, companies
hire me (and I am grateful). What is goofy is that they hire me and then systematically ignore my advice.
A few years ago I began to get a complex. I began to worry that maybe all of the good ideas I stole from
Grady Booch, Bjarne Stroustrop, Kent Beck, John Vlissides, William Opdike, Scott Meyer, Alan Cooper,
Martin Fowler, Ivar Jacobson, Sigmund Freud, Kid Rock, Sergio Zyman, Stephen Pinker, and Clayton
Christiansen were crap. Then I realized that most managers were homers. They were going to choose
their ideas over mine and that was it.
You see, we all want to feel smart, and there is no better way to accomplish that than hiring a so
called expert and then following your ideas anyway. I know you are thinking: Paul, you just picked
the wrong geniuses to steal ideas from. For a while I would have agreed with you, but then I began
to notice that Microsoft and IBM consultants were being ignored too (and my shrink said I was paranoid).
He said that managers are homers and stupid, and they routinely have too much money and need to unload
some. Like hiring a Vegas hooker for the weekend, these managers use their few extra bucks to hire
contractors for a short-term ego boost but ultimately go home to their wives.
OOP Wars
Recently, I read an article by Richard Mansfield, a published author, in which he raised the question
of whether OOP was a valid paradigm or not. At first, I thought this was a satirical piece inspired by
the number of VB6 guys who don't want to upgrade to VB.NET. However, after reading the article I realized
Mansfield was serious. My visceral response was "what a nut-job." After looking at the picture posted
with the article, I thought "old dog can't learn new tricks."
Oddly enough, the article fomented a tremendous amount of debate, although much of it was basically OOP
guys condescending to the author about his lack of OOP prowess. The general response was that those who
don't do OOP probably really don't get it. (Even Grace Hopper is rolling over in her grave at the prospect
of going back to flowcharts and procedural programming.) OOP will not be the last evolutionary step in
software development, but most engineers and non-technical people intuitively grasp the idea that state
and behavior go together.
I think the next phase will be more and better components, higher-level abstractions. If I could see into
the future beyond that, I could afford to dictate my articles to a bodacious twenty-something made mostly
of silicone, but that's the way it goes.
Note: This weekend I finished Michael Crichton's book State of Fear. Crichton does excellent research
and State of Fear is no exception. In it, Crichton's characters face eco-terrorists and challenge
conventional wisdom, but some really eye-opening discussions occur after the story in the Appendix,
entitled "Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous."
One of the discussions in the Appendix is about Eugenics. In short, Eugenics is the science that
ultimately was the basis for the Holocaust. The basic cautionary argument was that sometimes conventional
wisdom is both wrong and dangerous and, if brave souls aren't willing to challenge such wisdom, bad things
can happen.
Richard Mansfield wrote the OOP article for DevX.com. While I don't think OOP is wrong or dangerous like
Eugenics, I think Richard is probably one of those guys willing to publicly challenge conventional wisdom
and that is a rare quality. I still maintain that we are not turning back the clock on OOP, but I encourage
you to read Richard's article and the discussion that ensued.
Employee Appreciation
Generally, I don't feel compelled to summarize my residual brain droppings, but I did in this case.
I encourage you to stay home. Find an employer that gives you some flexibility in your daily schedule,
pays you enough money to take a real vacation every year—driving to Myrtle Beach doesn't count—and drive
any kind of car you want, and invests in a retirement plan that is not solely based on company stock.
If you are extremely talented, look for a company with a nap room, a library, Starbucks coffee, free
snacks, covered parking, a gym, and a game room—but don't hold your breath.
Disclaimer: This article and all of its contents are completely fictional except for the part
about the rats, Michael Crichton, and Richard Mansfield. My customers and the customers of Software
Conceptions, Inc. are the best, most generous people anywhere in the world, and the managers are
particularly bright.