|
Federalist No. 2
Concerning Dangers from Foreign Force and Influence
For the Independent Journal.
Author: John Jay
To the People of the State of New York:
WHEN the people of America reflect that they are now called
upon to decide a question, which, in its consequences, must prove
one of the most important that ever engaged their attention,
the propriety of their taking a very comprehensive, as well as
a very serious, view of it, will be evident.
Nothing is more certain than the indispensable necessity of
government, and it is equally undeniable, that whenever and however
it is instituted, the people must cede to it some of their natural
rights in order to vest it with requisite powers. It is well
worthy of consideration therefore, whether it would conduce more
to the interest of the people of America that they should, to
all general purposes, be one nation, under one federal government,
or that they should divide themselves into separate confederacies,
and give to the head of each the same kind of powers which they
are advised to place in one national government.
It has until lately been a received and uncontradicted opinion
that the prosperity of the people of America depended on their
continuing firmly united, and the wishes, prayers, and efforts
of our best and wisest citizens have been constantly directed
to that object. But politicians now appear, who insist that this
opinion is erroneous, and that instead of looking for safety
and happiness in union, we ought to seek it in a division of
the States into distinct confederacies or sovereignties. However
extraordinary this new doctrine may appear, it nevertheless has
its advocates; and certain characters who were much opposed to
it formerly, are at present of the number. Whatever may be the
arguments or inducements which have wrought this change in the
sentiments and declarations of these gentlemen, it certainly
would not be wise in the people at large to adopt these new political
tenets without being fully convinced that they are founded in
truth and sound policy.
It has often given me pleasure to observe that independent
America was not composed of detached and distant territories,
but that one connected, fertile, widespreading country was the
portion of our western sons of liberty. Providence has in a particular
manner blessed it with a variety of soils and productions, and
watered it with innumerable streams, for the delight and accommodation
of its inhabitants. A succession of navigable waters forms a
kind of chain round its borders, as if to bind it together; while
the most noble rivers in the world, running at convenient distances,
present them with highways for the easy communication of friendly
aids, and the mutual transportation and exchange of their various
commodities.
With equal pleasure I have as often taken notice that Providence
has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united
people--a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking
the same language, professing the same religion, attached to
the same principles of government, very similar in their manners
and customs, and who, by their joint counsels, arms, and efforts,
fighting side by side throughout a long and bloody war, have
nobly established general liberty and independence.
This country and this people seem to have been made for each
other, and it appears as if it was the design of Providence,
that an inheritance so proper and convenient for a band of brethren,
united to each other by the strongest ties, should never be split
into a number of unsocial, jealous, and alien sovereignties.
Similar sentiments have hitherto prevailed among all orders
and denominations of men among us. To all general purposes we
have uniformly been one people each individual citizen everywhere
enjoying the same national rights, privileges, and protection.
As a nation we have made peace and war; as a nation we have vanquished
our common enemies; as a nation we have formed alliances, and
made treaties, and entered into various compacts and conventions
with foreign states.
A strong sense of the value and blessings of union induced
the people, at a very early period, to institute a federal government
to preserve and perpetuate it. They formed it almost as soon
as they had a political existence; nay, at a time when their
habitations were in flames, when many of their citizens were
bleeding, and when the progress of hostility and desolation left
little room for those calm and mature inquiries and reflections
which must ever precede the formation of a wise and wellbalanced
government for a free people. It is not to be wondered at, that
a government instituted in times so inauspicious, should on experiment
be found greatly deficient and inadequate to the purpose it was
intended to answer.
This intelligent people perceived and regretted these defects.
Still continuing no less attached to union than enamored of liberty,
they observed the danger which immediately threatened the former
and more remotely the latter; and being pursuaded that ample
security for both could only be found in a national government
more wisely framed, they as with one voice, convened the late
convention at Philadelphia, to take that important subject under
consideration.
This convention composed of men who possessed the confidence
of the people, and many of whom had become highly distinguished
by their patriotism, virtue and wisdom, in times which tried
the minds and hearts of men, undertook the arduous task. In the
mild season of peace, with minds unoccupied by other subjects,
they passed many months in cool, uninterrupted, and daily consultation;
and finally, without having been awed by power, or influenced
by any passions except love for their country, they presented
and recommended to the people the plan produced by their joint
and very unanimous councils.
Admit, for so is the fact, that this plan is only RECOMMENDED,
not imposed, yet let it be remembered that it is neither recommended
to BLIND approbation, nor to BLIND reprobation; but to that sedate
and candid consideration which the magnitude and importance of
the subject demand, and which it certainly ought to receive.
But this (as was remarked in the foregoing number of this paper)
is more to be wished than expected, that it may be so considered
and examined. Experience on a former occasion teaches us not
to be too sanguine in such hopes. It is not yet forgotten that
well-grounded apprehensions of imminent danger induced the people
of America to form the memorable Congress of 1774. That body
recommended certain measures to their constituents, and the event
proved their wisdom; yet it is fresh in our memories how soon
the press began to teem with pamphlets and weekly papers against
those very measures. Not only many of the officers of government,
who obeyed the dictates of personal interest, but others, from
a mistaken estimate of consequences, or the undue influence of
former attachments, or whose ambition aimed at objects which
did not correspond with the public good, were indefatigable in
their efforts to pursuade the people to reject the advice of
that patriotic Congress. Many, indeed, were deceived and deluded,
but the great majority of the people reasoned and decided judiciously;
and happy they are in reflecting that they did so.
They considered that the Congress was composed of many wise
and experienced men. That, being convened from different parts
of the country, they brought with them and communicated to each
other a variety of useful information. That, in the course of
the time they passed together in inquiring into and discussing
the true interests of their country, they must have acquired
very accurate knowledge on that head. That they were individually
interested in the public liberty and prosperity, and therefore
that it was not less their inclination than their duty to recommend
only such measures as, after the most mature deliberation, they
really thought prudent and advisable.
These and similar considerations then induced the people to
rely greatly on the judgment and integrity of the Congress; and
they took their advice, notwithstanding the various arts and
endeavors used to deter them from it. But if the people at large
had reason to confide in the men of that Congress, few of whom
had been fully tried or generally known, still greater reason
have they now to respect the judgment and advice of the convention,
for it is well known that some of the most distinguished members
of that Congress, who have been since tried and justly approved
for patriotism and abilities, and who have grown old in acquiring
political information, were also members of this convention,
and carried into it their accumulated knowledge and experience.
It is worthy of remark that not only the first, but every
succeeding Congress, as well as the late convention, have invariably
joined with the people in thinking that the prosperity of America
depended on its Union. To preserve and perpetuate it was the
great object of the people in forming that convention, and it
is also the great object of the plan which the convention has
advised them to adopt. With what propriety, therefore, or for
what good purposes, are attempts at this particular period made
by some men to depreciate the importance of the Union? Or why
is it suggested that three or four confederacies would be better
than one? I am persuaded in my own mind that the people have
always thought right on this subject, and that their universal
and uniform attachment to the cause of the Union rests on great
and weighty reasons, which I shall endeavor to develop and explain
in some ensuing papers. They who promote the idea of substituting
a number of distinct confederacies in the room of the plan of
the convention, seem clearly to foresee that the rejection of
it would put the continuance of the Union in the utmost jeopardy.
That certainly would be the case, and I sincerely wish that it
may be as clearly foreseen by every good citizen, that whenever
the dissolution of the Union arrives, America will have reason
to exclaim, in the words of the poet: ``FAREWELL! A LONG FAREWELL
TO ALL MY GREATNESS.''
PUBLIUS.
Federalist No. 3 -->
|