12. GUNS
“...The right of the
people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” - Constitution of the United States,
Amendment II, Dec. 15, 1791
“Arms, like laws,
discourage and keep the invader and the plunderer in awe, and preserve order in
the world as well as property.” - Thomas Paine
Guns are a compact, powerful means of defending one's self,
or assaulting someone else. The first
is admirable, and the second, usually not.
Politicians deliberately link the words "defense" and
"assault," which have entirely different meanings.
Rather than punishing the second, far too
many politicos attempt to remove the ability to do the first from hundreds of
millions of citizens; naturally receiving rapturous applause from the
gun-haters. The press gladly goes along with the output of the irrational ones
who shriek over and over that, "guns kill people," and we must
get them out of everyone's hands.
I have never heard of a gun killing anyone. Guns are merely
machined pieces of hardened metal. They must be held, loaded, pointed, and the
trigger pulled by someone, in order for them to operate.
A gun can kill no one, as it is a totally
inanimate object. Other such objects
are autos, poisons, bricks, rocks, pens and pencils, airplanes, gas,
electricity, nicotine, whiskey, fire, dynamite, fertilizer and fuel oil made
into a bomb, or thousands of objects, which, in the hands of a demonized
criminal can kill, but not without the aid of a human mind and action.
It is impossible for a gun, unassisted, to kill anyone.
Grisly photos and stories are searched out by the biased
media to show how evil these inanimate objects are.
Several cities are suing gun manufacturers for simply making
them. Since automobiles kill over
43,000 a year, I can not understand why these idiots don't sue auto
manufacturers, or for that matter bathtub producers, since thousands die from
falls in them. 500 kids die in bike accidents each year.
Sue the manufacturer? Over 1,000 die in
residential fires each year. Over 1,000 kids under the age of 15 die each year
from drowning in pools or in boating accidents.
Sue the manufacturers?
Statistics and polls are presented to show that all reasonable minded citizens
would like to have everyone's gun confiscated, even though the entire matter is
impossible, and the statistics and polls are total untruths.
America has been treated to one of the most
outlandish, deceptive, negative campaigns in history...about guns.
The consequences of attempts to make guns illegal, are that
innocents may not be able to defend themselves in time of need.
Criminals can always get a gun. They can be bought illegally 'on the
street,' as dozens of TV magazine shows have proven.
Mayhem can be committed by anyone, with any weapon at hand, be it
a rock, automobile, knife, or even a telephone.
In South Africa, tens of thousands die each year from stabbings,
with no guns involved. In most cases of
a gun being used to murder innocents, if there had been a gun in the possession
of a bystander, the murderer would have been quickly dispatched before he
completed his nefarious scheme. Be it
on a Long Island Railroad commuter train, in a schoolyard, post office, or
restaurant, there have always been innocents handy, who could have stopped the
rampage instantly, if they had been carrying a gun.
An absolute fact, is that each year guns instantly prevent
over a million crimes from being committed.
Unloaded guns, loaded guns, or guns held in experienced or inexperienced
hands, but guns in the hands of a would be victim, and pointed at the criminal,
stop over a million crimes a year. There is no greater occupational hazard for
a criminal, than a gun in the hands of a nervous, terrified householder or
storekeeper. "Now look lady, don’t point that thing at me, it may go
off! You don’t know how to handle
it. See, your hands are shaking. I'll just leave and we'll forget I ever saw
you. Sorry I upset you. Now you put
that thing down, and I'm out of here!"
A criminal getting off that easily would be lucky.
I will not justify a certain town in Illinois, a suburb of
Chicago, by naming it, because that town outlawed the possession of guns a few
years ago, and any one caught with one was prosecuted.
Idiotic citizens by the hundreds turned in
their guns, and guess what? Crime
escalated by tens of percentage points.
Why not? Burglars and thieves
didn’t have to be afraid any longer, knowing they probably aren't going to be
shot at by a housewife or businessman.
I am a life member of the National Rifle Association, (NRA) and Gun
Owners of America (GOA) and am proud of it.
I mention this only because a member of the NRA gets a monthly magazine
titled, "The American Rifleman," and each month I eagerly await
reading one of the first features, titled "The Armed Citizen," which
quotes actual newspaper stories of gun owners who dispatched criminals with
their guns. A typical entry reads, "92
year old Conrad Schwarzkopf had been sleeping in his Long Island,
New York home when a punk four times his
junior barged into his bedroom, beating
him up. Schwarzkopf tried to fight back
but was no match for the younger man, and wound up being tossed into a closet.
There, as the young man ransacked the house looking for money, Schwarzkopf found his
semi-automatic pistol he kept in the closet and emerged from its darkness firing,
striking his assailant in the hand and chest.
The injured criminal immediately ran to a pay phone where he called the
police and confessed to robbing a
house and being shot by the homeowner." - The New York Times, 9/7/95.
An Associated Press story in November 1993, illustrates
what can happen if an honest citizen carries a gun, because one never knows
what may happen.
"It seemed like a perfect night for
a mugging. The street was dark, the
hour late, the Brooklyn neighborhood rough.
But the teen-age boys who stalked Arthur Boone as he left a corner
market Sunday missed one thing: the 44 caliber Magnum tucked in his belt.
One of the muggers, nicknamed
"B-Boy," put the barrel of a BB gun to Boone’s head.
The other, "Taz," reached for his
wallet. Then Boone fired three shots
heard ‘round the city. ...Boone shot
and killed his assailants with the unlicensed .44.
He waited for police to arrive, told them he was a victim of past
muggings, and quietly surrendered."
The story goes on for many paragraphs, but the BB gun was
an exact replica of a real gun, the perpetrators had police records, and Boone
was taking no chances. He went free.
From the founding of Jamestown in 1607 to the 1968 Gun
Control Act, America had a lower crime rate than it has since that act became
law. 88% of all assaults do not involve
firearms; 77% of all robberies do not involve firearms; and 41% of homicides do
not involve firearms. An even higher percentage of car thefts, burglaries,
embezzlements, frauds, acts of vandalism and arson, do not involve firearms.
Gun control legislation is a total swindle, deliberate deception, unnecessary,
and disarms innocent civilians, who need to protect themselves and their
property.
In May of 1982, Kennesaw Georgia enacted a law requiring
every household to own a firearm. I
have personally talked to the town clerk and police chief to verify this fact,
plus the astounding statistics that have followed. In the first year, crime
decreased 16%, something like 60% the second year, and now residential
burglaries have decreased by 89%. Why would a criminal be so foolish as to try
to rob or burgle, when everyone in town has a gun? Might as well go somewhere
else where they don't have such a law...you’ll live a lot longer.
Delaware County, New York has a population
of 47,000. Those 47,000 people own
44,000 handguns, and 220,000 long guns.
According to Sheriff Len Rutherford, "That’s
about 5 for every man, woman, and child in the county. If a burglar is
planning to break in somewhere, he won’t
do it if he knows there are guns in the house."
The town of Virgin, Utah has no measurable crime other than
dogs running loose, or minor violations of that type.
Maybe that's because an ordinance states,
"In order to provide for and protect the safety, security, and
general welfare of the town and its inhabitants, every household residing in
the Virgin Town limits is required to maintain a firearm, together with
ammunition thereof."
One of the first things a would be dictator does is
confiscate all guns. Hitler did it, as
did the Marxists after the Russian Revolution. Could Hitler have gotten very
far if the German citizens had possession of personal firearms?
Hardly, as the Nazis were in the minority,
and never did achieve majority status.
The Nazis had arms; arms that had been confiscated
("registered") from the citizens they later killed, maimed, and
tortured. When you register guns, it is all too easy to say you aren't
"qualified" to own it, when
you are a would be dictator. Here is a
direct 1935 quote from Adolph Hitler, after he
registered, and then confiscated the guns.
"This year will go
down in history. For the first time, a
civilized nation has full gun registration. Our streets will be safer, our
police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the
future." An armed elite can
always rule an unarmed majority...without their consent.
Any nation's elite, including America's, live
in dread of the majority getting enough of their dictums, and rising up. This
is especially true of an armed majority, which America happens to have. Tyrants
are always wholeheartedly in favor of gun control.
It's not easy to murder and brutalize those who can fight back.
Yes, and that includes American tyrants and wannabes.
Gun control worked well in Kosovo!
"The strongest
reason for the people to retain the right to bear arms is, as a last resort, to
protect themselves against tyranny in government." - Thomas Jefferson
"God created all
men, but Sam Colt made them equal." - 19th
Century saying.
Colt invented the
revolver. The revolver made skills with swords, bows and arrows, and other
crude instruments of conquest unnecessary.
Guns require little skill and strength to operate and protect ones self
with...a great benefit to humankind.
The problem is not guns, but criminals. The problem is
criminals being released by bubble headed judges upon the promise to "go
straight," or other such nonsense.
Our police work so hard rounding up the scum, only to have their noble
efforts unwound by nincompoop judges. Compact machines, (guns) are not the
problem. If a person has evil intent,
the lack of a gun will not stop him, because he can get one.
If he doesn't have a gun, a crowbar, rock,
knife, or similar weapon will often suffice, but a would be victim's possession
of a gun is the criminal's worst nightmare.
An example of the above mentioned judges can be illustrated
by a syndicated column written by Mark Patinkin, which appeared in the Dec. 10,
1993 Rocky Mountain News, parts of which are as follows:
"...I give you
the case of Jerome Sandusky. Sandusky
is 80 now, very alert, a former textile executive who lived most of his life in
Manhattan. After the mugging, he felt he had to move, so he’s living in New
Jersey today, living out his retirement years on too little money.
"...He was due
to have dinner with friends and headed into a subway station near his Upper
West Side home. What happened next was very quick.
Suddenly, two young men grabbed him. His glasses were knocked off
and broken. He was hit on the nose and
began to bleed. He was pushed against a
wall and immobilized as one of the men put an arm around his neck.
The other man began going through his
pockets. Sandusky tried to holler, but
at that, the man behind him said, "If you don’t shut up, I’ll choke you to
death." He felt he was going to die.
"...That’s when
a plainclothes policeman with the New York Transit Authority likely saved his
life. The policeman and a woman partner
heard Sandusky and ran down the stairs. Announcing they were police, they
ordered the assailants to stop. They ignored them and began running in opposite
directions. The policeman shot one,
Bernard McCummings, hitting him in the spine, while the other got away.
"Now let’s fast
forward. McCummings was convicted of
assault and served two years, serving it in a wheelchair, since he was
paralyzed from the policeman's shot. He
decided he too was a victim and filed suit for damages against the New York
Transit Authority, and was awarded $4.3 million."
Several appeals, running all the way to the U.S. Supreme
Court, resulted in nothing. McCummings
got his $4.3 million. The Supreme Court says criminals have nothing to worry
about, as long as they run away. Crime
does pay. The old adage and bumper
strip is factual, which says;
"When guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns."
The politicians are trying to make that come true.
Speaking of wise sayings, I recently saw a bumper strip that proclaimed,
"Teddy Kennedy’s car has killed more people than my gun."
Government insists that we use seat belts, drive within the
speed limit, and does every other sort of thing to protect us from real or
imagined harm. Our tools must conform to safety standards, as must our homes,
businesses, cars, appliances, and even clothes.
Simultaneously, politicians attempt to rob us of our ability to
protect ourselves from our enemies. In
Switzerland, every man is required to own a gun, know how to use it, and have
10,000 rounds of ammunition in his home.
There is little crime in Switzerland.
The consequences of confiscating our guns have not happened
yet, as Americans fight for these rights tooth and nail, but there would be
hideous crime and citizen pummeling by the criminal set, if guns were finally
confiscated from the non-criminals. I don’t want to ever see those
consequences. Another bumper strip reads,
"Sure! You can have my gun...if you can pry it from
my dead, cold, stiff fingers."
During the famous Rodney King riots, calls to
"911" proved fruitless. The police openly admitted they couldn't
possibly protect the innocents, as there was too much crime. That was not a new
situation, and it was confirmed by Morgan Reynolds, a scholar at Texas A&M
University, who has studied the statistics.
His facts are as follows: "The
police cannot protect people from crime. The police are the folks who
come around to investigate after you have
been shot, raped, or robbed. Occasionally, they catch the villain.
For example, only 7% of all burglaries
result in an arrest, and only 1.2% result in imprisonment for an average of 13
months. That comes to 4.8 days in jail for each burglary."
The Rodney King affair is a dark blot on the U.S.
jurisprudence system. After the police
were freed by one jury, the federal government, in violation of the double
jeopardy clause in our Constitution's Fifth Amendment, and in total
violation of the Seventh Amendment,
tried them again and saw to it they were convicted. The
police went to jail, while King was not only free, but got millions from the
LAPD. He was drunk, speeding recklessly through residential neighborhoods, and
on probation when the police attempted to arrest him. He has since run afoul of
the law several times. Our sacred Constitution’s Fifth Amendment says in part,
"…nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice
put in jeopardy of life or limb..."
The Seventh Amendment was quoted in Chapter 10, and does not allow for
people to be tried twice for the same crime in different courts, only once for
the same offense. Not satisfied with the first trial jury's verdict, the feds
concocted a "deprivation of
Constitutional rights through state law" case for the second trial,
which was an outrage. If anyone’s
"rights" were deprived, it was the police and citizenry of Los
Angeles, by allowing Rodney King to be out of jail for even a minute.
The LA Police were sorely abused.
A letter to "Dear Abby" regarding the King trial
is informative:
"The Rodney King
Trial was on TV for 6 hours each day. I heard and saw videotapes and testimony
of the normal effect of stun guns—police in training receiving a stun gun shot,
and falling like pole-axed steers—yet Rodney King only blinked and kept coming
at the officers.
>"I heard
testimony of Mr. King's throwing officers—two at a time—to the ground like rag
dolls. All this was in the 20 minutes
before the famous one-minute 'bite' that was all most of the media and a
segment of our population saw.
"I was finally
given the opportunity to see the tape in its entirety.
Here I saw a man who had been hit four times
with 50,000 volts of electricity continue to fight and resist police.
I saw him lunging at a policeman. I saw him defying all normal reaction to
pain. I saw a brief moment when he lay
still, and at that moment one policeman reached for his handcuffs.
Then the man was up on his hands and knees again."
King was freed, continues to abuse the law, the brave LA
Police went to jail, and Los Angeles is out millions of dollars to King alone,
not to mention the hideous riots that broke out when the police were freed
after the first trial. Politicos
successfully outlawed certain automatic weapons in 1995, saying that people
didn’t need such weapons. Those hapless storeowners in LA could have used
automatic, or any other weapons during the riots. When the riots started,
thousands went to buy guns to defend themselves and their property…but were
denied. California law dictates that issuance of a gun permit has a mandatory
15 day waiting period. By then it was
too late, and thousands of law-abiding businessmen and homeowners lost
everything they owned, by not being able to protect themselves. The Los Angeles
rioters burned more than 5,300 buildings, caused the death of 58, injury to
over 2,300, and the property damage was more than $750 million.
Had those innocents all been owners of guns
of any type, those riots would have been extremely brief.
As it was, they went on and on, with nothing
to stop the lawless from robbing, burning, beating, killing, and maiming.
Think about the police and their crime fighting abilities,
and you will have to quickly admit that in perhaps 99% of the cases, the police
arrive on the crime scene after the crime has been committed, to fill out
forms, take pictures, and make reports. Burglar alarms notify the police after
the place has been broken into, and by the time the police respond, it is too
late. Police mostly ride around in air conditioned cars with closed windows.
Criminals can hide in bushes or dark places,
climb onto roofs, and in hundreds of ways be invisible to a passing, virtually
soundproof patrol car. How can police possibly stop crime?
They can’t, openly admit it, and that’s why
they urge the installation of alarm systems in both homes and cars.
I can think of nothing finer than to have enough money to
hire a "home cop" to protect me.
Businesses and factories hire security forces that are armed, and do
indeed protect them. Isn’t the best
possible home cop, a gun? Think about
it. A home cop that requires no salary,
no feeding, no deductions, is on duty 24 hours a day, and can even be carried
about wherever you go. In confrontations with criminals, armed citizens have
their guns taken away in only 1% of the cases.
Armed citizens mistakenly kill innocents 30 times a year, compared with
the police, who accidentally kill innocents 330 times a year.
(Remember that there are over 200 million
guns in private hands in America.) The
crime rate in the wild, woolly, frontier west, was lower than in many of
today's major cities, and I might add, the justice was swifter and fairer.
The so-called "Saturday night
special" is a complete misnomer, but even a cheap gun will provide adequate
protection for the innocents from would be marauders, burglars, rapists, or
robbers.
Is there any better way for a 110 pound woman to dispatch a
would be 225 pound rapist or robber, than to point a gun at him, and pull the
trigger? The would be victim of a
criminal can handily eliminate a dangerous situation without getting close
enough for actual physical contact, abuse, or overpowering.
Know of any other method of doing that?
I do not understand why the liberals, and even many
Republicans want to disarm law-abiding citizens, who deter far more crime than
do the police. Guns do not kill, people
kill. Statistics from the Johns Hopkins Injury Prevention Center show deaths of
children from birth to age 14, over a five year reporting period, resulted from
the following: Firearms - 2.9%. Other - 97.1%. A study of homicides by the
Chicago Police Department showed that 85% of murderers had previous criminal
records. There is no reason to disarm
the law-abiding citizen. The so-called
"assault weapon," includes any semi-automatic, which the gun haters are
staying up nights devising plans to confiscate.
In an 11-year period, only 11 officers were listed as being
killed by them, 58 with some other weapon, 126 with their own gun, and 737 in
traffic accidents.
Maybe we need beer glass control, because Discover Magazine
reports that in the United Kingdom, there are a reported 5,000 attacks on
citizens each year...by thrown beer glasses. The liberals captured the British
political system in May 1997, and on June 11th, guns were actually
outlawed in England. By a 384-181 vote,
the House of Commons voted to outlaw pistol ownership in Britain.
The AP story quotes labor lawmaker Austin
Mitchell, who said the bill,
"doesn’t do anything about illegal weapons, which are a major problem."
Australia also outlawed guns in 1998. What
will happen to the crime rate now? It
has actually happened: Guns have been outlawed, and only outlaws will have
guns...in England and Australia. In Australia, citizens, who by law were forced
to do so, because they were registered, turned in 640,381 personal
firearms. Since the Aussies have
collected and made gun ownership illegal, armed robberies are up 69%, assaults
with guns up 28%, murders with guns up 19% and home invasions up 21%.
Registration gives the names and addresses
of lawful owners, making confiscation easy.
The incorrectly titled "assault weapon" is
basically an ordinary gun that fires at each pull of the trigger without
re-cocking, correctly called a "semi-automatic," which is very
common. Semi-automatics are in no way machine
guns, which have been outlawed since 1936.
"Assault weapon" is merely a literary tool that has been
successfully used by the anti-gun lobby, and the phrase has attached itself to
liberal politicians like chewed bubble gum on a hot sidewalk. The phrase
"assault weapon," is a gross miss-labeling of a modern gun, and
nothing else. Outlawing "assault weapons" is merely another step in
the seizing of our guns, by those who should know better. In America, more
people were killed by baseball bats in 1992, than were killed by so called
"assault weapons."
The ratio of "good guys" to "bad guys" in America today, has to
be at least 50 to 1. There are very few
really bad guys who cause the trouble, make the papers, inhabit the jails, and
are a nuisance that has become intolerable.
A gun is our best protection against the bad guys, and an instrument
that will obviously turn a bad guy, not necessarily into a "good"
one, but certainly one that is afraid to practice his trade as much, if at all,
because of the inherent danger to his life.
Several states have begun to issue carry permits, allowing
citizens to carry concealed guns on their person wherever they may choose to go
during the course of their travels. While few permits have been issued, the
startling statistics do not lie. A
detailed study by the Chicago Law School shows that in counties with
populations of more than 200,000, right-to-carry laws have reduced murder rates
by more than 13%. Additionally, when
women carry a concealed handgun, their murder rate decreases four times as much
as men's. Florida heads the list of states issuing carry permits, more than
300,000 between Oct. 1, 1987 and Dec. 31, 1995.
Only five violent crimes were committed with permitted pistols,
and none of these resulted in fatalities.
Ever see a Columbine School rampage at a gun show?
Private ownership of guns has always been inextricably
identified with freedom. Freedom from overpowering government or overpowering
criminals, who sometimes are indistinguishable, as in Revolutionary times.
Privately owned guns made it possible for
ordinary farmers and citizens to overpower the British.
Without there having been lots of rifles and
guns, we might still be ruled by Mother England.
Kids have always played "guns," or "cops and
robbers," using toy guns. The
anti-gun extremists have gone so far as to severely punish kids who might bring
a toy gun to school. The peak of
absurdity came in January 1997; when 10 year old Jeffrey Parks brought his
11-inch high plastic "GI Joe" toy to school. "GI Joe" has a
one-inch plastic pistol with it, and after the panic-stricken teacher
confiscated the one-inch toy, little Jeffrey was expelled from his elementary
school. The punishment was later changed to "one year probation." The
Seattle School District considered this absurdity, "zero tolerance."
I am sick to death of the continual "civil
rights" nonsense, and it is obvious that one of our main civil rights,
according to our Constitution's Second Amendment is the right to own a
gun. One never hears of that "civil right" does one?
"It is much safer to be feared than loved." - Machiavelli.
Maybe that's why, according to a study by the General Accounting Office,
(GAO) an astounding 60,000 government employees in 45 different agencies now
carry guns as a routine part of their job, and not just law enforcement agents,
but bureaucrats employed by the departments of Education, Fish and Wildlife
Service, Small Business Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, and
even poultry inspectors and disaster aid workers.
In 1996, 2,436-armed personnel were added to the federal
government's payroll. Congressman Ron
Paul, one of the really good guys from Texas, blasted the
"massive buildup of a virtual army of armed regulators."
How about gun control for the federal government?
See why we need ours?
A book published in 1987 titled "The Battle Of Athens,"
by Stephen Byrum vividly portrays
how citizen ownership of guns actually saved this Tennessee community from a
band of crooked politicians who had hamstrung the county for years with crooked
elections that kept bums in office. No
one was killed, but the guns effectively booted them out of office.
SOLUTIONS
"Are we at last
brought to such a humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be
trusted with arms for our own defense?
Where is the difference between having our arms in our own possession
and under our own direction, and having them under the management of congress?
If our defense be the real object of having
those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety or safety to
us, as in our own hands?" - Patrick Henry
Our Government has betrayed us.
Americans should be able to not only determine their economic,
political, and other destinies, but their physical destiny as well, meaning
that they must be allowed to protect themselves.
There should be no laws of any kind regarding guns.
Everyone should own them, and if that
happened, crime would all but disappear.
Owning guns are a Constitutional right as specified in the Second
Amendment. There were no such laws
until that traitorous disaster, FDR, persuaded his Democrat Congress to pass
the National Firearms Act of 1934, to be followed by the Gun Control Act of
1968. Has crime escalated since then? You bet!
How would I cut crime? Simple. Re-arm the
citizenry, and restore our Constitutional rights.
Disband the ATF, (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms)
require everyone to own a gun after passing an instant check for being a felon,
or having a criminal or mental illness record. (This is not registration!)
In September 1997, among the crowd at Sam's Restaurant in
Jacksonville Florida, were two old geezers who were each licensed to carry a
gun...and were doing so. They were eating at separate tables, and didn't know
each other. A robber came in and
attempted to hold up the joint, at which point both of them arose from their
seats and shot the robber, sending him to the hospital and certainly thwarting
his chances of a successful heist. The restaurant owner now proudly shows off
the two small bullet holes in the wall of his restaurant. The story made NBC
News with Tom Brokaw on September 26, 1997. That's a solution for guns, not
what England, Australia, and now California have done, which is confiscating
all or some licensed guns. The millions
of gun owners who had enough sense not to register theirs, are unknown
to the law enforcement agents in those two unfortunate countries, and
California, who can still defend themselves.
Think about how much time and money, gun-toting civilians
can save. If a heinous crime is
committed, and the villain is caught by the police, the court logjam, time
spent in jail, parole agents, and the whole nine yards, costs a fortune, and
most of the time the criminal goes free. If that crime were stopped short, and
the criminal sent to his reward by a gun carrying citizen, all that
razz-ma-tazz legal stuff would be saved...a mighty savings for the taxpayer! I
wouldn’t hesitate to shoot to kill a murderer, rapist, child molester, or a criminal
performing other serious outrages. Guns are the honest citizen's friends, and
the instant justice they can perform is simply wonderful.
Laws should mandate severe prison terms for anyone using a
gun to commit or attempting to commit a crime.
Schools should have compulsory courses teaching firearm safety and use,
and all teachers should have a gun on them at all times.
Some states, including Colorado, where I
live, already have laws that allow shooting someone found on your premises
without your permission, and such laws should be adopted by all states.
"Make My Day" laws should be the norm. Pennsylvania law mandates a minimum
prison term of 5 years for anyone convicted of committing a crime with a gun.
Carrying legally owned guns should be encouraged. The thousands that are
killed, robbed, raped, and assaulted each year would be greatly reduced by gun
carrying citizens. Guns are the friends of the law abiding, and in our hands
are the archenemies of criminals. Besides the licensed ones, always keep a few
that are unlicensed and unregistered.
Registering guns is merely an identity card for future
confiscation, and if history repeats itself, even genocide.
In each of the seven genocides in this
century, taking 56 million lives, there were gun control laws on the
books. Genocide is impossible without
gun control. To those who say
registration is not confiscation, allow me to point out that England,
Australia, and California are right now confiscating legally registered guns
from innocent civilians, who foolishly believed rotten politicians' promises
not to do so. These good faith gun
owners handed over their names and addresses to government, who now is
confiscating their prime means of protection.
Thanks and a tip of the hat to Charles Maxwell, whose
"ABC's of Gun Control" was
published on the wonderful web site lewrockwell.com on Sept. 22, 2K.
They are, according to him:
- An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject.
- A gun in the hand is better than a cop on the phone.
- Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface.
- Gun control is not about guns; it is about control.
- If guns are outlawed, can we use swords?
- If guns cause crime, then pencils cause misspelled words.
- Free men do not ask permission to bear arms.
- If you don't know your rights, you don't have any.
- Those who trade liberty for security have neither.
- The United States Constitution © 1791. All rights reserved.
- What part of "Shall not be infringed" do you not understand?
- The Second Amendment is in place in case they ignore others.
- 64,999,987 firearm owners killed no one yesterday.
- Guns have only two enemies: Rust and Politicians.
- You don't shoot to kill; you shoot to stay alive.
- 911 - Government sponsored Dial a Prayer.
- Assault is a behavior, not a device.
- Criminals love gun control - it makes their jobs safer.
- If guns cause crime, then matches cause arson.
- Only government is afraid of citizen control.
- You only have the rights you are willing to fight for.
- Know guns, know peace and safety. No guns, no peace and safety.
- Removing people's right to bear arms creates slavery.
- The American Revolution would never have happened with gun control.