10. THE "CIVIL" WAR
"There are few,
I believe, in this enlightened age, who will not acknowledge that slavery as an
institution is a moral and political evil." -Robert E. Lee - December 27, 1856
- 5 years before the war began.
I have always had strong, special feelings for the South,
and the wrongly titled "Civil War." "The War Between the
States," "The War of Southern Independence," or even "The
War Of Northern Aggression" are more correct, descriptive titles.
In a civil war, two sides are fighting for
control of one government. The South
didn't want to take over the North's government, but seceded from it so as to
govern itself. Going back to that fateful year of 1861, the new Republican
Party's President, Abraham Lincoln, used unconstitutional "executive
orders" to start the war and remove the Constitutional writ of
habeas corpus from many Northerners,
arresting 38,000 innocent citizens, newspaper editors, teachers, businessmen,
etc. with no evidence of disloyalty or subversion to the Union.
Many were kept in dreadful conditions for
many months. On the night of September 12, 1861, Lincoln had federal troops
arrest dozens of Maryland legislators and other prominent citizens, including
the mayor of Baltimore, and a Maryland Congressman.
When the chief justice of the United States, Roger Brook Taney
ruled that he had no constitutional power to do so, Lincoln ordered his arrest
too! Additionally, Lincoln closed over
300 Northern newspapers which had printed unfavorable comments about him,
interrupted state legislatures, seized private property, censored telegraph
lines, and blockaded the South, all without congressional approval.
Lincoln's military governors sometimes
ordered hangings, without trial, for minor offenses.
Mere suspicion of disloyalty to the Union was enough to expose
one to Lincoln's governmental reign of terror.
Virtually 100% of Democrats in both the North and South were
against the War, and that explains why, as late as 1980, Democrats laid claim
to a "Solid South." By 1863,
the North was virtually broke, and had lost so many battles with the South,
with heavy casualties, that they were running out of men and money, even though
the paper money presses were running night and day. New York instituted a draft
to bolster the number of Northern soldiers, with the provision that anyone
drafted could pay $300 to get out of service.
A draft at any time is slavery, but that didn't seem to bother the
North. The April 1863 draft riots resulted in hundreds of deaths, hundreds of
buildings burned to the ground, and are still regarded as possibly the worst
civil upheaval in American history. Lincoln
violated the Constitution in many ways, starting and fighting that unpopular
war.
The War Between the States has become universally thought
of as being fought over slavery, which is not true. Slavery wasn't even
announced as a war aim till the war had been going on for two years! General Ulysses
Grant had slaves, and many Northerners had slaves until the Emancipation
Proclamation. Who did that "emancipate?"
The South had already seceded, and no proclamation had any effect
on them. Lincoln was determined to start a war to pressure the South into his
version of a Federalist - John Adams - Alexander Hamilton envisioned, strong,
overpowering central government, which would have, and actually has become, a
virtual monarchy. The South was intent
on keeping with the Constitutionally authorized republican form of strong,
self-governing states, and a weak central government. They disagreed, and the
South respectfully decided to become independent, and remain friends with their
northern neighbors. They sent emissaries to Lincoln to attempt a peaceful
resolution of their problems, but Lincoln refused to see them.
"I have no
purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery
in the states where it now exists. I
believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do
so." - Abraham Lincoln
"I tried all in
my power to avert this war. I saw it
coming, and for twelve years I worked night and day to prevent it, but I could
not. The North was mad and blind: It would
not let us govern ourselves, and so the war came, and now it must go on till
the last man of this government falls in his tracks, and his children seize the
musket and fight our battle, unless you acknowledge our right to self
government. We are not fighting for
slavery. We are fighting for independence,
and that, or extermination we will have." -Jefferson Davis, President of the
Confederacy - 1864
Lincoln has become a sort of divine luminary and poster boy
to Republicans. Like Bill Clinton,
Lincoln didn't receive a majority vote when he became President, and when he
started that dreadful conflict, two thirds of the North, the entire South, and
his cabinet were against it. An
impeachment was even begun in an attempt to get rid of him. Abe Lincoln had a
hideous ten-year marriage to Mary Todd, whose family were slaveholders, and
even though he sired four children by Mary, they quarreled constantly, and
Lincoln is said to have had a long-term "loving" relationship with a
male, Joshua Speed. Lincoln was a
disaster, was responsible for the loss of 620,000 lives, the virtual
destruction of the South, and the killing of thousands of innocents by the
likes of William Tecumseh Sherman, a
vainglorious, brutal man, who can easily be compared to the worst of WW II
Nazis or Japanese. The 15,000 unarmed
women and children left in Atlanta, hardly deserved to have their entire city
burned, as well as much of the rest of the South on Sherman's infamous
"march to the sea." In a
letter to his son, a year before he died, Sherman expressed his regret that his
armies did not murder every last Indian in North America.
By the time Lincoln started the War, only 6% of Southerners
even had slaves, which cost as much as $1500 in gold, and were far too
expensive for most farmers. Slaves were
originally imported by England, and later the North.
Those the North didn't want to keep, were sold to the South,
which was attempting to responsibly free them, when Lincoln had his way.
The State of Virginia, on October 5, 1778,
passed "An act for preventing
further importation of slaves."
In keeping with that philosophy, the Confederate Constitution of 1861,
Article 1, Section 9, Clause 1 says, "The
slave must be made fit for his freedom by education and discipline and thus be
made unfit for slavery." Both
of these were long before Lincoln's War. Lincoln's famous speech where he
declared all men to be equal, doesn't exactly agree with a speech he gave on
October 16, 1854, when he said, "There
is a natural disgust in the minds of nearly all white people to the idea of an
indiscriminate amalgamation of the white and black races…Free them and make
them politically and socially our equals?
My own feelings would not admit to this."
On September 18, 1858 he said, "I will say then, that I am not, nor
ever have been, in favor of bringing about, in any way, a social and political
equality of the white and black races, that I am not, nor ever have been in
favor of making voters or jurors of Negroes, or of qualifying them to hold
office, nor to intermarry with white people.
And I will say in addition to this, there is a physical difference
between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two
races living together in terms of social and political equality.
And in so much as they cannot so live, while
they remain together, there must be the position of superior and inferior, and
as I, as much as any other man, am in favor of having the superior position
assigned to the white race."
The New England States had begun attempts to leave the
Union as early as 1800, when Thomas Jefferson was elected President. New
England Federalists immediately began a secession movement, and continued their
efforts for 50 years without anyone starting a war with them to "save the
Union" or "abolish slavery."
They had slaves too, and made huge profits importing and selling them to
the South. Many Loyalist New Englanders wanted to get out of the Union, sign a
separate treaty with England, and become a separate nation.
The North taxed the South severely, which
was another reason for the War. The North's
taxes were the result of the South supplying 75% of America's exports, with
their tobacco and cotton. The "Tariff of Abomination" forced the
South to pay heavy tariffs when purchasing supplies and machinery from the
North, such tariffs paying for the majority of
federal government expenses.
Fort Sumter was a tariff collection place for the North, and the South
wasn't about to let the North re-supply it.
Remember, it was similar exorbitant tariffs that caused America to
secede from Britain 90 years earlier.
The Louisiana Purchase virtually doubled the area of the
U.S. at three cents an acre, and most of the new states wanted to govern
themselves, rather than be subservient to a federal giant. This was a threat to
federal plans to dominate everyone, and another cause of the War.
Most of the North thought the South was
within its rights and correct in its pursuits. Even then, most feared what we
have now become…a pitiful nation being ruled by our inferiors with an all
powerful central government, consisting of tens of thousands of lame brained,
mouth breathing bureaucrats, a Congress and President woefully out of touch
with their constituencies, and becoming more powerful and unconstitutional with
each passing day. When Aaron Burr
killed Alexander Hamilton in that famous duel, Hamilton's federalist, powerful
central government ideas didn't die with him.
If dishonest Abe had listened to the South, The War Between the States
would have been avoided, 620,000 lives saved, the South not burned, bankrupted,
disgraced, and pillaged, and America would be as our Founders planned when they
wrote the Constitution. That
Constitution includes a Bill of Rights, the Tenth Amendment of which gives the
states the right to self-government.
Washington, Madison, and Jefferson were right, and Hamilton and Lincoln
were hideously in error.
Those not content to accept the South's side, point out
that South Carolina fired the first shot on Fort Sumter, thus beginning the
War. The fact is that the six "Cotton States" had already seceded,
had already seized federal forts, lands and armaments, and no war had been
started. South Carolina's taking Fort
Sumter was a logical step in the process of recovering property rightfully
belonging to it, and not allowing the North to re-supply it or collect more
usurious taxes. It wouldn't have been
prudent for a seceded state to have a northern fortress in the middle of its
harbor. When they attempted to re-supply, after repeated warnings, they got
fired upon. It is that simple. Lincoln
planned it that way, and there is ample proof of it. The Constitution says that
only Congress can declare war, but dishonest Abe did it on his own, with no
Congressional or even civilian approval. Union soldiers were fighting against
self-determination, and the Confederates for the right of their people to
govern themselves. The Confederates
fighting for independence from an overbearing, overtaxing central government
were duplicating the fight the revolutionaries had with England a few decades
previously.
"The day before
Sumter was surrendered, two thirds of the newspapers in the North opposed
coercion in any shape or form and sympathized with the South.
These papers were the South's allies and
champions. Three fifths of the entire
American people sympathized with the South.
Over 200,000 voters opposed coercion and believed the South had the
right to secede," - Horace Greeley, editor of the New York Herald Tribune, April 1861.
Greeley also said on February 5, 1861 that, "Nine
out of ten people of the North were opposed to forcing South Carolina to remain
in the Union. The great principle embodied by Jefferson in the Declaration…is
that governments derive their just power from the consent of the governed.
(Therefore if the Southern states want to
secede)…they have a clear right to do so."
Why do Republicans continue to idolize dishonest Abe?
Ulysses Grant, who was 5'3"and a drunk, Robert E. Lee
and most top military officers in both the South's and North's armies were
graduates of West Point. There they had been taught that to deny a state the
right of secession, "would be
inconsistent with the principle on which all our political systems are founded,
which is, that the people have in all cases, a right to determine how they will
be governed." A quote from
"A View of the Constitution," a West Point textbook.
When it was politically provident for him to
say so, Lincoln espoused secession, as he did when he spoke on July 4, 1848,
saying, "Any people whatsoever have
the right to abolish the existing government, and form a new one that suits
them better. This is a most valuable, a most sacred right."
It must also be pointed out that Lincoln
didn't oppose West Virginia's seceding from Virginia. The so-called "Civil
War" was a disgusting affair, and no fault of the South.
It isn't as if the North was favorable to blacks, or wanted
them, even before Lincoln's War. The
Revised code of Indiana stated in 1862, that,
"Negroes and mulattos are not allowed to come into the
state." Illinois, that so
called "Land of Lincoln," had almost identical restrictions in 1848,
as did Oregon in 1857. Most Northern
states in the 1860's did not permit immigration by blacks, or if they did,
required them to post a $1,000 bond that would be confiscated if they behaved
"improperly." Senator Lyman
Trimball of Illinois, a close confidant of Lincoln's said that,
"our people want nothing to do with the
Negro." The Philadelphia Daily
News of November 22, 1860 editorialized that,
"the African is naturally the inferior race."
Alexis de Tocqueville wrote in
"Democracy in America" that, "The
prejudice of race appears to be stronger in the states that have abolished
slavery than in those where it still exists."
The entire War was a disaster. It was unconstitutionally
begun by Abraham Lincoln, resulted in the deaths of 620,000 Americans,
endless polarization of two sections of America, and between two races.
Why do the Republicans still celebrate
"Lincoln Day?" I cannot
understand this endless fascination with a man who was, in this writer's
opinion, an evil man.